2004
DOI: 10.1541/ieejias.124.750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensorless Vector Control of Induction Motor Stabilized at the Whole Region with Speed and Stator Resistance Identification based on Augmented Error

Abstract: This paper proposes new identification laws of an adaptive flux observer for speed sensorless vector controls. In speed sensorless vector controls of an induction motor with the adaptive observer, the speed identification system is known to be unstable in a part of regenerating region. In addition, it is pointed out that the stator resistance variation interferes with the speed identification. Thus it is necessary to find an adaptive scheme which can stabilize the identification system.In this paper, firstly, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical approach to rotor flux estimation is the configuration of a flux state observer. State observer-based vector control methods using this approach can be divided into two groups: those with full-order (fourth order) flux state observers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and those with minimum-order (second order) flux state observers [8][9][10][11][12][13]. In the latter case, as compared to the former, the design of the observer gain, which governs observer performance, is easier, and the computing load is reduced by about half.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A typical approach to rotor flux estimation is the configuration of a flux state observer. State observer-based vector control methods using this approach can be divided into two groups: those with full-order (fourth order) flux state observers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and those with minimum-order (second order) flux state observers [8][9][10][11][12][13]. In the latter case, as compared to the former, the design of the observer gain, which governs observer performance, is easier, and the computing load is reduced by about half.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In IM vector control not using encoders or other position/speed sensors, the speed must be estimated, in addition to the flux phase. When a full-order flux state observer is employed, the observer is adapted on the basis of adaptive state observer theory so that the rotor speed can be adaptively identified [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. The additional computing load needed for this purpose is usually small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many speed estimation methods have been proposed and some have been put into practical use [1][2][3]. Methods of improving the estimation performance include, for example, identification of the primary and secondary resistances [4][5][6][7], optimum design of an observer [8], and high-frequency signal injection [9]. Conventional studies have also pointed out that in addition to optimization of the speed estimation method, it is also important to reduce the errors of the motor parameters, especially the primary resistance error at low speed, and that both speed estimation and primary resistance identification are apt to become unstable in regenerative operation [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system becomes unstable at low speed and in regenerating mode. To enhance the low speed performance, adaptive gain design for the Adaptive Rotor Flux Observer (AFO) has been proposed [3,4] and a method of correction of the adaptive law has been proposed [5,6]. Stability improvements for low speed and regenerating operation are reported in each approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both design methods assure stability at low speed and in regenerating operation except for a small region near zero frequency. Hamajima proposed a rotor speed and stator resistance identification method based on augmented error [5]. Hinkkanen proposed a rotor speed identification method based on the current estimation error component which is parallel to the rotor flux estimate [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%