high uncertainty levels and require less modeling information than do robust control methods. These facts make adaptive control theory a candidate for many science and engineering applications.Adaptive control approaches can be classified as either direct or indirect [4][5][6]. Direct adaptive controllers adapt feedback gains in response to system variations without requiring a parameter estimation algorithm. This property distinguishes them from indirect adaptive controllers that employ an estimation algorithm to approximate unknown system parameters and adapt controller gains. The control framework of this paper builds on a well-known class of direct adaptive controllers, specifically, model reference adaptive controllers.Whitaker et al. [7,8] originally proposed the model reference adaptive control concept. In particular, model reference adaptive control schemes have three major components, namely, an ideal reference system (model), an update law, and a controller. The ideal reference system captures a desired closed-loop dynamical system behavior for which its output (resp., state) is compared with the output (resp., state) of the uncertain dynamical system. This comparison results in an error signal used to drive the update law online. Then, the controller adapts feedback gains to minimize this error signal using the information received from the update law. It is of practical importance to note that the output (resp. state) of the uncertain dynamical system can be far different from the output (resp. state) of the ideal reference system in transient time, even though this scheme guarantees that the distance between the uncertain dynamical system and the ideal reference system vanishes asymptotically (in long term, i.e., steady state). Therefore, a high learning rate can be used in the update law to yield fast adaptation to rapidly suppress the system uncertainties in transient time.Although numerous applications have used adaptive control, the necessity of high-gain feedback for achieving fast adaptation can be a serious limitation of adaptive controllers [9][10][11]. Specifically, in certain applications, fast adaptation is required to achieve stringent stabilization or command following performance specifications in the face of large system uncertainties and abrupt changes in system dynamics. In such situations, high-gain adaptive control is necessary for rapidly reducing the mismatch between the uncertain dynamical system and the ideal reference system. However, update laws with high learning rates are not robust against high-frequency dynamical system content. That is, update laws with high learning rates possibly yield to control signals with high levels of measurement noise content and can excite unmodeled dynamics, resulting in system instability for practical applications [12]. Hence, a critical trade-off between system stability and control adaptation rate exists in most adaptive control approaches, with some notable exceptions [13][14][15].The authors in [13] present a high-gain adaptive control a...