2010
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensorless induction motor adaptive observer-backstepping controller: experimental robustness tests on low frequencies benchmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1 Comparing the proposed nonlinear H-infinity control approach against backstepping nonlinear control for induction motors one should take into account that backstepping control is a special case of flatness-based control and actually it is a global linearizing method [24,30,31]. Thus for the nonlinear backstepping control of induction motors hold the same remarks which have been state in the introduction of the article, in the comparison between global linearizationbased control methods and nonlinear H-infinity control [32].…”
Section: Simulation Testsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 1 Comparing the proposed nonlinear H-infinity control approach against backstepping nonlinear control for induction motors one should take into account that backstepping control is a special case of flatness-based control and actually it is a global linearizing method [24,30,31]. Thus for the nonlinear backstepping control of induction motors hold the same remarks which have been state in the introduction of the article, in the comparison between global linearizationbased control methods and nonlinear H-infinity control [32].…”
Section: Simulation Testsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…(36) have been selected so as to linearize Eqs. (30) and (32) and to produce first-order linear ODE. The control signal in the inertial coordinates system a − b will be…”
Section: Field Oriented Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However due to parameters uncertainties and/or disturbances the backstepping-based controller fails to eliminate steady-state speed error. Then, in order to ensure a better precision, an integral action is now introduced in the backstepping control following the technique used for the induction motor in [16]. Moreover a Maximum-Torque-Per-Ampere strategy is used in order to improve the efficiency of the IPMSM.…”
Section: Robust Mtpa Integral Backstepping Control Of Ipmsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the adaptive control of the vector control with rotor resistance adaptation, other works have proposed the speed sensorless control [9][10][11][12][13][14]. The elimination of speed sensors has become an inevitable task to guarantee the high performance control and operating reliability, not only because the sensors increase the cost and complexity of machines, but also the measures are stained by the noise that affects the robustness of control, especially in hostile environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%