2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensorimotor integration during stance: Processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

13
69
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
13
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a few studies have addressed the time course of sway before and after a contact transition [2,3,4]. Sway stabilization with light touch is a time-consuming integrative and attention demanding process [2,3,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies have addressed the time course of sway before and after a contact transition [2,3,4]. Sway stabilization with light touch is a time-consuming integrative and attention demanding process [2,3,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have investigated the nature of this touch effect [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, previous studies on the effect of light skin contact on body sway have focused on steady state contact only; except two [13,14] studies have probed the time course of body sway subsequent to touch onset or withdrawal. The postural control system reweights all available sensory channels in order to optimize the sensorimotor control of stance in altered sensory environments [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabin and colleagues [13] probed the time course of the light touch effect with a paradigm where finger tip light touch had to be established abruptly. They reported that upon contact body sway is exponentially reduced with a time constant of 1.6 s. In a more recent study, Sozzi and colleagues [14] adopted a paradigm with actively as well as passively initiated, abrupt addition or withdrawal transitions of visual or haptic afferent information. In the active transitions of haptic cues from no-touch to touch, they reported a latency of the onset of sway decrease of around 1.3 s with a time constant of 0.8 s. With regard to an after-effect following touch withdrawal, they observed a shorter latency of the onset of sway increase of just 1 s with a time constant of 0.8 s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations