2007 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information 2007
DOI: 10.1109/issnip.2007.4496891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Standards: Overview and Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be able to employ the BIM approach for tasks related to structural performance monitoring, open standard data models that fully describe the infrastructure assets, monitoring systems and processes, and that manage and visualise the acquired data are required. In relation to monitoring and sensor data, many standard data models have been developed, as reported by Hu et al (2007) and Lee (2007). In this paper, only standard data models developed by Building Smart and the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) are addressed as they are the only ones closely related to the construction industry.…”
Section: Interoperability and Standard Data Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to employ the BIM approach for tasks related to structural performance monitoring, open standard data models that fully describe the infrastructure assets, monitoring systems and processes, and that manage and visualise the acquired data are required. In relation to monitoring and sensor data, many standard data models have been developed, as reported by Hu et al (2007) and Lee (2007). In this paper, only standard data models developed by Building Smart and the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) are addressed as they are the only ones closely related to the construction industry.…”
Section: Interoperability and Standard Data Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requirement is addressed by SensorML. Therefore, Hu et al [10] convert TEDS to SensorML by creating a knowledge base which maps each TEDS property to an appropriate SensorML description. It would be promising to extend this approach and to combine it with our work to automatically generate SIDs for IEEE 1451 sensors so that an SID interpreter can connect IEEE 1451 sensors on-thefly with SWE services.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source discovery mechanisms based on standards and services constitute the second group of features of context acquisition. Standards, such as the family of IEEE 1451 standards 3 and SensorML 4 provide a way of describing sensor specifications for supporting opportunistic discovery [26]. For example, the context management infrastructure propose by Hu et al takes advantage of these standards [23], [27].…”
Section: Context Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, most context management approaches support features such as context disposition and data management, rather than fault tolerance, scalability, and autonomicity. However, several research efforts have made important contributions for the latter three features [32], [27], [26], [38], [39].…”
Section: Maintenance and Evolution Of Context Management Infrastructumentioning
confidence: 99%