2008 3rd IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks 2008
DOI: 10.1109/dyspan.2008.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Selection for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common design objective of optimal sensing is to maximize the network throughput by minimizing the sensing overhead (e.g., in terms of time and energy) under certain performance constraints, e.g., detection accuracy/delay and interference to the primary users. To this end, various sensing-related performance tradeoffs have been exploited in many different contexts, such as sensor selection [5], [11], sensing scheduling [8], [12], [13], and channel sensing ordering [14]. For example, Liang et al [7] optimized the sensing time by making the tradeoff between the sensing accuracy and the sensing time overhead in order to maximize the secondary network throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common design objective of optimal sensing is to maximize the network throughput by minimizing the sensing overhead (e.g., in terms of time and energy) under certain performance constraints, e.g., detection accuracy/delay and interference to the primary users. To this end, various sensing-related performance tradeoffs have been exploited in many different contexts, such as sensor selection [5], [11], sensing scheduling [8], [12], [13], and channel sensing ordering [14]. For example, Liang et al [7] optimized the sensing time by making the tradeoff between the sensing accuracy and the sensing time overhead in order to maximize the secondary network throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various aspects of cooperative sensing have been studied, such as cooperation gain [3], [19], sensor selection [27], security [28], [29], [30], and performance-overhead tradeoffs [31], [32], [33]. The benefits of sensor collaboration have been reported to diminish as the degree of shadowing correlation among sensors increases [3], [19], [21], [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize this detrimental effect of shadowing correlation on cooperative sensing, several sensor-selection algorithms have been introduced. For example, Selén et al [27] proposed heuristic algorithms for selecting an uncorrelated set of sensors, given different levels of information about sensor locations. In a similar vein, Kim and Shin [4] suggested selecting sensors based on their geographical separation, so as to make the sensors uncorrelated with each other.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of attack, cooperative sensing can significantly improve the incumbent detection performance by carefully choosing a suitable set of cooperative sensors [5], [8], [9]. However, sensors are often deployed in open hostile environments, and can be compromised by an attacker or exposed to external interferences that can distort the measurement results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%