2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1000-9361(11)60386-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Optimization Selection Model Based on Testability Constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the fact that sensors may express different sensitivities to fuel cell performance change, and environment/measurement noise is usually contained in the collected measurements, more sensor measurements may not provide better performance, thus it is necessary to find the optimal sensors providing reliable results with the minimum computation cost. From a literature review, several sensor selection approaches have been applied in different systems [19][20][21][22], but their applications in fuel cell system PHM have not been fully investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the fact that sensors may express different sensitivities to fuel cell performance change, and environment/measurement noise is usually contained in the collected measurements, more sensor measurements may not provide better performance, thus it is necessary to find the optimal sensors providing reliable results with the minimum computation cost. From a literature review, several sensor selection approaches have been applied in different systems [19][20][21][22], but their applications in fuel cell system PHM have not been fully investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system fault detection reliability can be described by FDR, which is the ratio of the number of faults detected correctly by the sensors to the total number of system faults during the stated time span. The larger the value of FDR, the higher the fault detection reliability, as shown in Equation (7) [22].…”
Section: B Fault-sensor Dependency Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FAP is the probability of a false alarm when a fault is mistakenly detected. By considering the impact of the sensor attributes on detectability and predictability, the FIR and FAP can be formulated using Equation (9) and Equation (10) [22].…”
Section: B Fault-sensor Dependency Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is vital to optimize sensor selection to reduce the scale of sensors and obtain the same or an even better monitoring effect. The existing sensor selection methods can be grouped into two categories: the model-based method [10,[13][14][15][16] and the optimization method considering testability constraints [17,18]. The former establishes a graph or mathematical model to describe the relationship between the sensors and failure modes, such as the dependency model, heuristic graph, and state diagram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%