2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor node tracking using semi-supervised Hidden Markov Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They design a safe WSN routing model based-on HMM and block attacks like blackholes. Many others techniques had used hidden Markov models in WSN to improve the performance of an existing model [33,34,35,36,37] .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They design a safe WSN routing model based-on HMM and block attacks like blackholes. Many others techniques had used hidden Markov models in WSN to improve the performance of an existing model [33,34,35,36,37] .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, proposed mechanism [51] combined the semisupervised machine learning technique and support vector regression to find out the target nodes locations. Protocol [52] used semi-supervised hidden Markov model to solve the localization problem for mobile nodes in WSNs.…”
Section: Problems and Challenges In Wsn And Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, machine-learning models have recently been included to improve localization accuracy [25]. These integrated techniques include k-means clustering [26], artificial neural networks (ANNs) [27,28], fuzzy logic (FL) [18,[29][30], support vector machines (SVMs) [15,31], Bayesian optimization [20], principle component analysis (PCA) [21], and semi-supervised [32] or deep learning [33].…”
Section: The Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [21] introduced a nonconvex robust PCA algorithm to eliminate outliers. Kumar et al [32] presented a localization technique that used a semisupervised hidden Markov model (HMM) for mobile WSN nodes. The algorithm worked well in both indoor and outdoor environments, while requiring fewer training data than some models.…”
Section: The Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%