2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor-based weed detection and application of variable herbicide rates in real time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An image processing system that estimates the relative leaf area is described as one of the most adequate methods for this purpose (Burgos-Artizzu et al, 2009). Several sophisticated approaches based on satellite images, robotic systems, and specific tools for weed identification have been developed (Gerhards & Oebel, 2006;Dammer & Wartenberg, 2007;López-Granados, 2011). Most of these tools require high levels of training for operation and have high costs associated with the technology and machinery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An image processing system that estimates the relative leaf area is described as one of the most adequate methods for this purpose (Burgos-Artizzu et al, 2009). Several sophisticated approaches based on satellite images, robotic systems, and specific tools for weed identification have been developed (Gerhards & Oebel, 2006;Dammer & Wartenberg, 2007;López-Granados, 2011). Most of these tools require high levels of training for operation and have high costs associated with the technology and machinery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger numerical values of NDVI are associated with greater crop vigour and greater amounts of aboveground biomass (Grohs et al, 2009). It is important to note the existence of similar equipment, such as the Weedseeker™ (Sui et al, 2008) and an optoelectronic weed sensor (Dammer & Wartenberg, 2007), Reflectance indices as adiagnostic tool for weed control ... which were developed specifically for the quantification of weeds. These equipment pieces have been used principally for discriminating between weeds and soil for herbicide application in vineyards and orchards (Lópes-Granados, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a field study to test the effectiveness of VRT in soybeans involving three herbicides rates (100, 67 and 33 % use rates), the medium rate provided weed control similar to that of the full rate (Thorp and Tian 2004) while the 33 % rate failed to provide acceptable levels of weed control. To overcome the difficulty associated with weed distribution differences, Dammer and Wartenberg (2007) designed a sprayer capable of applying variable rates of herbicides by detecting weeds using a sensor. In 13 field trails carried out in cereals and peas an average of 25 % herbicide reduction was achieved without causing any crop yield reduction.…”
Section: Technology In Weed Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dammer and Wartenberg 22 established a spot-spraying system under two wavelengths of light (650 and 830 nm) and measured an NIR/R quotient. Dammer et al 22 have explored the spectral features of different kinds of weeds and crops for their identification under specified conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%