1997
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2400696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitization of multidrug-resistant human leukemia cells with MDR1-targeted antisense and inhibition of drug-mediated MDR1 induction

Abstract: expression. 15,18 This raises the possibility that failure of a com-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cell lines represent a minor fraction of the developmental stages described for T-cell ontogeny (Bene et al, 1995;Burger et al, 1999;Wuchter et al, 2002). While most of these drug resistance studies have used only the CCRF-CEM or MOLT-4 cell lines (McGrath et al, 1989;Li et al, 1997), CCRF-CEM cells represent a Pre-T (CD1a ) surface CD3 ) ) stage of differentiation (Burger et al, 1999), and MOLT-4 shows immunophenotypic and genotypic features of natural kill (NK) cells. Furtheremore, while the direct investigation of patient samples remains an important goal in translational research, such studies are often difficult to conduct ex vivo (Manabe et al, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cell lines represent a minor fraction of the developmental stages described for T-cell ontogeny (Bene et al, 1995;Burger et al, 1999;Wuchter et al, 2002). While most of these drug resistance studies have used only the CCRF-CEM or MOLT-4 cell lines (McGrath et al, 1989;Li et al, 1997), CCRF-CEM cells represent a Pre-T (CD1a ) surface CD3 ) ) stage of differentiation (Burger et al, 1999), and MOLT-4 shows immunophenotypic and genotypic features of natural kill (NK) cells. Furtheremore, while the direct investigation of patient samples remains an important goal in translational research, such studies are often difficult to conduct ex vivo (Manabe et al, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism for which the majority of oligonucleotides have been designed to date is to cause translational arrest by binding to the translation initiation codon or alternatively to bind to areas in the coding region to attempt steric hindrance of ribosome progression along the mRNA (Brysch and Schilingensiepen, 1994;Crooke and Bennett, 1996;Ohkawa et al, 1996;Bouffard et al, 1996;Probst and Skutella, 1996). Although the ribosomal machinery is quite powerful and tends to sweep away most obstacles in its path, targeting the AUG initiation codon where the ribosomes first begin translational has been shown to be a very effective target (Vasanthakumar and Ahmed, 1989;Jaroszewski et al, 1990;Rivoltini et al, 1990;Clynes et al, 1992;Corrias et al, 1992;Efferth et al, 1993;Thierry et al, 1993;Quattrone et al, 1994b;Nakashima et al, 1995;Alahari et al, 1996;Cucco and Calabretta, 1996;Sola and Colombani, 1996;Hirtake et al, 1997;Li et al, 1997).…”
Section: Antisense Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and his co-workers designed three antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides to mdr-1 (Li et al, 1997). One (1729) was just inside the coding region from bases +12 to +36, another (474) was targeted to the last 20 bases of the 5 untranslated region (-20 to -1), while the last oligo (1795) had the same sequence as 474 but with four 2 -O-methyl modified sugar linked bases at both ends (Table I).…”
Section: Use Of Antisense Oligonucleotides To Inhibit Mdr-1 Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) and vectors are reported to enhance the cytotoxicity of various drugs, by targeting modulators of drug activity and cell response as opposed to the drug target per se , with mdr1 and bcl‐2 being the most common targets of antisense (Cucco & Calabretta, 1996; Kitada et al ., 1994; Li et al ., 1997; Luo et al ., 1999; Miayake et al ., 2000; Quattrone et al ., 1994; Thierry et al ., 1993). Based on the success of in vivo screening of antisense ODNs, at least seven of these agents are currently in clinical trial for anti‐cancer treatment, with targets including bcl‐2 (Chen et al ., 2000; Scher et al ., 2000; Waters et al ., 2000) and p53 (Bishop et al ., 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%