2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitization and habituation of the acoustic startle reflex in patients with schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
80
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
80
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, no sensitization effect was found, as opposed to the study of Meincke et al (2004) (NB: although the effect of sensitization appears to reach towards significance in the current study, it was only based on the responses of three subjects, of which one was a considerable outlier (an increase in the response to trial 2 of 486% compared with trial 1)). The discrepancy between the current study and the study of Meincke et al (2004) regarding sensitization might be explained by the difference in subject population: in the current study, only males were included, whereas in the study of Meincke et al (2004) both males and females were included. As there are numerous reports in literature describing a gender difference in both PPI (Swerdlow et al, 1993Jovanovic et al, 2004;Kumari et al, 2004) and/or prepulse facilitation (Aasen et al, 2005), it is not inconceivable that gender differences might also exist in the processes of habituation and sensitization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, no sensitization effect was found, as opposed to the study of Meincke et al (2004) (NB: although the effect of sensitization appears to reach towards significance in the current study, it was only based on the responses of three subjects, of which one was a considerable outlier (an increase in the response to trial 2 of 486% compared with trial 1)). The discrepancy between the current study and the study of Meincke et al (2004) regarding sensitization might be explained by the difference in subject population: in the current study, only males were included, whereas in the study of Meincke et al (2004) both males and females were included. As there are numerous reports in literature describing a gender difference in both PPI (Swerdlow et al, 1993Jovanovic et al, 2004;Kumari et al, 2004) and/or prepulse facilitation (Aasen et al, 2005), it is not inconceivable that gender differences might also exist in the processes of habituation and sensitization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…As there are numerous reports in literature describing a gender difference in both PPI (Swerdlow et al, 1993Jovanovic et al, 2004;Kumari et al, 2004) and/or prepulse facilitation (Aasen et al, 2005), it is not inconceivable that gender differences might also exist in the processes of habituation and sensitization. Another explanation might be the difference in the intensity level of the background noise, which was slightly higher in the current study (70 dB) than in the study of Meincke et al (2004) (65 dB), which might have reduced the sensitization effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most notably, alterations in both paradigms have repeatedly been described in patients with schizophrenia and their firstdegree relatives (Adler et al, 1982;Cadenhead et al, 2000;Siegel et al, 1984). Furthermore, patients with schizophrenia show deficits in the habituation of the auditory startle reflex Meincke et al, 2004) and specific alterations in the AEP peak refractoriness paradigm (Shelley et al, 1999;Erwin et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%