2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.80.015023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity to the Higgs sector of supersymmetric-seesaw models in the lepton flavor violatingτμf0(980)decay

Abstract: In this work we study the lepton flavor violating (LFV) semileptonic ! f 0 ð980Þ decay within the context of SUSY-Seesaw Models, where the MSSM spectrum is extended by three right-handed neutrinos and their SUSY partners, and where the seesaw mechanism is used to generate the neutrino masses. We estimate its decay rate when it proceeds via the Higgs-mediated channel ! H Ã ! f 0 ð980Þ, where H refers to the CP-even MSSM Higgs bosons h 0 and H 0 , and the lepton flavor violating H vertex is radiatively generated… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a configuration cannot be realized in the CMSSM, but it could be realized in the so-called Non Universal Higgs Masses (NUHM) SUSY scenario. In such a framework, there are specific regions of the parameter space in which processes like τ → µη and τ → µf 1 (980), f 1 (980) → π + π − could have a branching ratio in the range 10 −9 to 10 −10 , comparable or even slightly larger than B(τ → µγ) [8,18,19].…”
Section: Lfv In Other Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a configuration cannot be realized in the CMSSM, but it could be realized in the so-called Non Universal Higgs Masses (NUHM) SUSY scenario. In such a framework, there are specific regions of the parameter space in which processes like τ → µη and τ → µf 1 (980), f 1 (980) → π + π − could have a branching ratio in the range 10 −9 to 10 −10 , comparable or even slightly larger than B(τ → µγ) [8,18,19].…”
Section: Lfv In Other Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scenarios of physics beyond the SM predict rates for LFV processes of charged leptons within the reach of present and future experiments. Some examples are: the SM with additional right-handed heavy Majorana neutrinos or with left-handed and right-handed neutral singlets [2], supersymmetric models [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], left-right symmetric models [15,16], technicolor models with non-universal Z exchange [17], multi-Higgs doublet models [18][19][20][21][22][23], leptoquark models [24][25][26], models with heavy vector-like leptons [27][28][29][30], and, the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity [31,32]. It is obvious then that if LFV transitions among charged leptons are observed at some point, it will be a challenging task to disentangle all the possible NP candidates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bands in the scalar form factors are given by the uncertainty in the kaon form factor normalizations. We emphasize that both the spectral forms and the normalizations are constrained in a fully model-independent way: no assumptions on dominance by certain resonances (e.g., the ρ 0 (770) or the f 0 (980)) or their specific PoS(Confinement X)240 quark substructure need to be made, in contrast to alternative approaches [11]. Experimental upper limits on the decay τ − → µ − π + π − have been given by the Belle collaboration [12] with and without kinematical cuts to isolate certain resonances.…”
Section: Pos(confinement X)240mentioning
confidence: 99%