2022
DOI: 10.1017/wet.2022.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity to sublethal rates of dicamba for selected mid-Atlantic vegetable crops

Abstract: Dicamba is a synthetic auxin herbicide that may be applied over the top of transgenic dicamba-tolerant crops. The increasing prevalence of herbicide-resistant weeds has resulted in increased reliance on dicamba-based herbicides in soybean production systems. Because of the high volatility of dicamba, it is prone to off-target movement, and therefore has been of increased concern regarding dicamba drift onto nearby specialty crops. The present study evaluates twelve mid-Atlantic vegetable crops species for sens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, growth or yield were not reduced at the 2.24 g ae ha -1 rate. In a greenhouse screening conducted prior to this study, Wasacz et al (2022) determined that 'Python' was less sensitive to low rates of dicamba than 'Burpless Beauty' cultivar, requiring 1.12 g ae ha -1 and 0.28 g ae ha -1 , respectively, to induce greater leaf deformation than noted for the nontreated control. It is not known why differences in dicamba sensitivity were observed in 'Python' cucumber between the greenhouse and field trials, although abiotic conditions, such as temperature, wind, or humidity, could have influenced the interaction between crop and dicamba.…”
Section: Cucumbermentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, growth or yield were not reduced at the 2.24 g ae ha -1 rate. In a greenhouse screening conducted prior to this study, Wasacz et al (2022) determined that 'Python' was less sensitive to low rates of dicamba than 'Burpless Beauty' cultivar, requiring 1.12 g ae ha -1 and 0.28 g ae ha -1 , respectively, to induce greater leaf deformation than noted for the nontreated control. It is not known why differences in dicamba sensitivity were observed in 'Python' cucumber between the greenhouse and field trials, although abiotic conditions, such as temperature, wind, or humidity, could have influenced the interaction between crop and dicamba.…”
Section: Cucumbermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Dicamba (XtendiMax®; Bayer Crop Science, St. Louis, MO) was applied at 0.056, 0.11, 0.56, 1.12, 2.24 g ae ha -1 , respectively, corresponding to 1/10,000, 1/5,000, 1/1,000, 1/500, and 1/250 of the maximum recommended label rate (560 g ae ha -1 ) for soybean. These rates were selected based on the lowest rate of dicamba (0.056 g ae ha -1 ) that induced a phytotoxicity response in sensitive soybean plants (Egan and Mortensen 2012) as well as rates previously evaluated in a greenhouse study with these vegetable species (Wasacz et al 2022). Over-the-top applications of dicamba were made using CO 2pressurized backpack sprayers calibrated to deliver 140 L ha -1 at 179 kPa for eggplant, and 187 L ha -1 at 138 kPa for cucumber and snap bean.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most current knowledge of the direct effects of nontarget, synthetic auxin exposure on plants comes from studies of crop plants with a focus on non-transgenic soybean [14,15,44], which like other members of the Fabaceae [45], is highly susceptible to synthetic auxins [46]. In fact, due to its sensitivity, recent landscape level dicamba drift events have been captured using soybean as the 'canary in a coal mine'.…”
Section: Direct Effects Of Synthetic Auxins On Plants and Herbivoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening methods vary widely and one of them uses the leaf injury rating caused by plant pests. Ni 2015) did survey and research to do selection of plants based on the ratings of leaf damage [12][13][14][15]. Seeing the various studies that have been carried out to find and produce FAW-resistant lines, this also encourages this research to obtain FAW-resistant lines and be able to find resistance properties in selected lines through crossbreeding and morphological analysis as planned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%