2010
DOI: 10.1038/nature09086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity to perturbations in vivo implies high noise and suggests rate coding in cortex

Abstract: It is well known that neural activity exhibits variability, in the sense that identical sensory stimuli produce different responses, but it has been difficult to determine what this variability means. Is it noise, or does it carry important information – about, for example, the internal state of the organism? We address this issue from the bottom up, by asking whether small perturbations to activity in cortical networks are amplified. Based on in vivo whole-cell recordings in rat barrel cortex, we find that a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

29
438
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 421 publications
(469 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(35 reference statements)
29
438
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the function of this variability is still being debated (Stein et al 2005), it is generally agreed that at least part of this variability arises from noise, which is due to the random opening of ion channels as well as the large synaptic bombardment that neurons are subjected to in vivo (Destexhe et al 2003;London et al 2010). It is possible to simply average away this variability in order to obtain an estimate of the mean response to a given stimulus, and this is frequently done when computing measures such as the peristimulus time histogram.…”
Section: Neural Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the function of this variability is still being debated (Stein et al 2005), it is generally agreed that at least part of this variability arises from noise, which is due to the random opening of ion channels as well as the large synaptic bombardment that neurons are subjected to in vivo (Destexhe et al 2003;London et al 2010). It is possible to simply average away this variability in order to obtain an estimate of the mean response to a given stimulus, and this is frequently done when computing measures such as the peristimulus time histogram.…”
Section: Neural Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, classic notions, such that cortical minicolumns may constitute the fundamental units of brain function (31), or that the cortex works by population coding in space (32) or rate coding in time (33) in the face of high intertrial variability (34), could then be tested rigorously using a measure of effectiveness. Examining small motifs that are overrepresented in complex networks [such as brains (35)] could determine whether the network as a whole is biased toward emergence or reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…embedded in a network of other neurons. In particular, spontaneous neural activity is largely caused by the massive quasi-random input from surrounding cells (Destexhe et al 2003), which also strongly affects a cell's computational properties (Brunel et al 2001;London et al 2010). Hence, when modeling single neuron activity, it is vital to properly account for the characteristics of the spike trains that constitute this input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%