2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04526.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity to optic flow in human cortical areas MT and MST

Abstract: The macaque V5/MT complex comprises several sub-regions but little is known of their human homologues. We examined human V5/MT with fMRI in terms of specificity to optic flow stimuli, a key characteristic of macaque MST. Stimuli were large fields of moving dots, forming coherent global flow patterns. Random motion was used as a control. Retinotopic mapping was also conducted. The previously suggested existence of at least two distinct sub-regions, MT and MST, within the V5/MT complex was confirmed. Human MT is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
220
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(89 reference statements)
31
220
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The most basic process is to pick up the current direction of travel (heading). In monkeys, both MSTd and the VIP have been implicated in processing the current direction of travel from ground plane flow, and human homologs are suggested by the studies of Morrone et al (2000) and Smith et al (2006). Area VIP is also sensitive to multisensory inputs, and this property was used to identify a human homolog of VIP (Bremmer et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most basic process is to pick up the current direction of travel (heading). In monkeys, both MSTd and the VIP have been implicated in processing the current direction of travel from ground plane flow, and human homologs are suggested by the studies of Morrone et al (2000) and Smith et al (2006). Area VIP is also sensitive to multisensory inputs, and this property was used to identify a human homolog of VIP (Bremmer et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into the neural basis of sensitivity to optic flow and direction of self-motion has focused on the properties of two brain areas, dorsal medial superior temporal cortex (MSTd) and ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Neurons in macaque MSTd respond selectively to specific optic flow components (Tanaka et al, 1989;Duffy and Wurtz, 1991), and a human area with similar properties has been identified (Morrone et al, 2000;Smith et al, 2006). The sensitivity of macaque VIP to heading has been established by Bremmer et al (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 A). Second, MT is identifiable relative to nearby visual areas by its distinct topographic organization Smith et al, 2006): MT is located anterolateral to LO1 and LO2 (Larsson and Heeger, 2006), has a representation of the fovea that is different from neighboring visual areas (see Fig. 2 B), and has a complete representation of the contralateral hemifield (see Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done because MT is distinguished from MST in terms of the sizes of the underlying receptive fields (Desimone and Ungerleider, 1986;Tanaka et al, 1986). MST neurons, unlike those in MT, have very large receptive fields that extend into the ipsilateral visual field and are thus not modulated strongly by the polar angle stimulus Smith et al, 2006). Applying these criteria enabled us to reliably identify MT in both hemispheres of all five subjects studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because specific patterns of locomotor activity produce specific patterns of optic flow, visual and motor processes are coupled such that large field optic flow typically triggers compensatory motor activity and postural adjustments in the observer. Although the neural mechanisms underlying optic flow perception by observers with ASD are unknown, part of the human MT complex known as area MST is strongly responsive during optic flow perception by typical observers (Smith, Wall, Williams, & Singh, 2006). In the study by Gepner et al, a small sample of children with ASD and age-matched control participants stood on a force plate positioned near a large screen.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Visual Motion Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%