1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00156.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity to and requirement for iron in Plantago species

Abstract: The relative importance of some aspects of iron nutrition for the distribution of six Plantago species (P. maritima L., P. coronopus L., P. major ssp. major L., P. serpentina All., P. media L. and P. lanceolata L.) with different habitat requirements for soil pH and moisture was evaluated. Iron efficiency and Fe tolerance of hydroponicallygrown plants were assessed by determining the decrease in relative growth rates caused by suboptimal and supraoptimal external Fe concentrations. Marked interspecific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that Fe efficiency in E. camaldulensis is comparable with the highly Fe-efficient group of Plantago species, in which growth did not differ between 1 and 10 lM of Fe when plants were raised in hydroponic conditions (Schmidt and Fuhner, 1998). This specific characteristic of E. camaldulensis was also indicated by the minor effect of different Fe treatments had on the chlorophyll content (Table 2) (Abadia et al, 1989;Fordor et al, 1995).…”
Section: Fe Enhances Al-induced Growth Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This suggests that Fe efficiency in E. camaldulensis is comparable with the highly Fe-efficient group of Plantago species, in which growth did not differ between 1 and 10 lM of Fe when plants were raised in hydroponic conditions (Schmidt and Fuhner, 1998). This specific characteristic of E. camaldulensis was also indicated by the minor effect of different Fe treatments had on the chlorophyll content (Table 2) (Abadia et al, 1989;Fordor et al, 1995).…”
Section: Fe Enhances Al-induced Growth Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The efficiency of Fe acquisition could be linked either to the ability to mobilize additional sources of Fe or to a higher rate of induction of FRO2 and IRT1 . The maximal velocity of FRO2 activity was found to be positively related to the relative growth rate of the species and was not related to the maintenance of the growth at low Fe concentrations (Schmidt & Fühner, 1998), making the capacity of rhizosphere acidification a likely candidate for a determinant of Fe uptake efficiency. While no clear differences among the weak and strong acidifiers were observable regarding the reduction of chlorophyll concentration or decrease in biomass production, strong acidifiers were generally characterized by a stable shoot–root ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the redox conditions of the soil, external iron levels to which plant roots are exposed may vary considerably, reaching toxic levels in the absence of oxygen. The deleterious eect of Fe toxicity is observed as blackening of root tips, inhibition of root growth and necrotic spots on the leaves (`bronzing'); (Snowdon and Wheeler 1995; Schmidt and FuÈ hner 1998). Several strategies to minimize oxidative stress induced by essential and nonessential heavy metals have been described in higher plants (Howden et al 1995;Murphy et al 1997;Gonza lez et al 1998;van der Zaal et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%