2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Recalibration of MEMS Microphones to Compensate Drift and Environmental Influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the variations in the microphones’ sensitivity, it is possible to reduce such variations by modifying the sensitivity levels through programming the gain and the bias voltage [ 45 ]. Additionally, we consider that the estimated error in the sensitivity of each individual microphone can be compensated through proper calibration in dedicated environments for noise analysis, such as laboratories endowed with a reverberant acoustic chamber.…”
Section: Sampling Process Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the variations in the microphones’ sensitivity, it is possible to reduce such variations by modifying the sensitivity levels through programming the gain and the bias voltage [ 45 ]. Additionally, we consider that the estimated error in the sensitivity of each individual microphone can be compensated through proper calibration in dedicated environments for noise analysis, such as laboratories endowed with a reverberant acoustic chamber.…”
Section: Sampling Process Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrimination methods are based on acoustic fingerprint as detailed later, -3 dB point, +3 dB point measurements and a data clustering algorithm. While one of the methods is based on the same principle presented in the sensitivity work of Walser et al [7], which was conducted in laboratory settings, this technique is developed further with demonstration within an in-field setup. Our methods are suitable for deployment both in laboratory conditions during the manufacturing or product return stages, or during device operation, making them ideal candidates as BIST methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%