2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-014-2160-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of WRF to driving data and physics options on a seasonal time-scale for the southwest of Western Australia

Abstract: Regional climate models are sensitive to the forcing data used, as well as order to better inform future long-term regional climate simulations for this re-8 gion. We show that the choice of radiation scheme had a strong influence on both 9 temperature and precipitation; the choice of planetary boundary layer scheme has 10 a particularly large influence on minimum temperatures; and, the choice of cumu-11 lus scheme or more complex micro-physics did not strongly influence precipitation 12 simulations. More impo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(101 reference statements)
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3-month model spinup period was used. The model setup and parameter options that were chosen by Andrys et al (2015Andrys et al ( , 2016Andrys et al ( , 2017 were based on the findings of Kala et al (2015), who explored the sensitivity of WRF to different physics options and input forcing data over SWWA. The setup included the single-moment 5-class microphysics scheme (Hong et al 2004), the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for longwave radiation (Mlawer et al 1997), the Dudhia scheme for shortwave radiation (Dudhia 1989), the Yonsei University planetary boundary layer scheme (Hong and Lim 2006), the Kain-Fritsch (Kain 2004) scheme for convective parameterization for the first (50 km) and second (10 km) domains only, the MM5 surface-layer scheme (Grell et al 2000), and the Noah land surface model (Chen and Dudhia 2001).…”
Section: B Climate Model Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A 3-month model spinup period was used. The model setup and parameter options that were chosen by Andrys et al (2015Andrys et al ( , 2016Andrys et al ( , 2017 were based on the findings of Kala et al (2015), who explored the sensitivity of WRF to different physics options and input forcing data over SWWA. The setup included the single-moment 5-class microphysics scheme (Hong et al 2004), the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for longwave radiation (Mlawer et al 1997), the Dudhia scheme for shortwave radiation (Dudhia 1989), the Yonsei University planetary boundary layer scheme (Hong and Lim 2006), the Kain-Fritsch (Kain 2004) scheme for convective parameterization for the first (50 km) and second (10 km) domains only, the MM5 surface-layer scheme (Grell et al 2000), and the Noah land surface model (Chen and Dudhia 2001).…”
Section: B Climate Model Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), have been conducted by Kala et al (2015) and Andrys et al (2015Andrys et al ( , 2016Andrys et al ( , 2017 using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. WRF is a next-generation mesoscale modeling system (Skamarock et al 2005) that has been commonly used for the purposes of dynamically downscaling GCMs, including applications in Europe (Heikkilä et al 2011;Soares et al 2012), North America (Gula and Peltier 2012), Asia (Chotamonsak et al 2011;En-Tao et al 2010), and eastern Australia (Evans and McCabe 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A coarse comparison of the two datasets did not reveal substantial differences in WRF output. Kala et al (2015) show and state that the use of ERA-Interim and FNL is appropriate for re-producing the past climate as accurately as possible.…”
Section: Initial and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%