2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13620-015-0049-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of two methods to detect Mycoplasma agalactiae in goat milk

Abstract: BackgroundLaboratory diagnostic techniques able to detect Mycoplasma agalactiae are essential in contagious agalactia in dairy goats. This study was designed: 1) to determine the detection limits of PCR and culture in goat milk samples, 2) to examine the effects of experimental conditions including the DNA extraction method, PCR technique and storage conditions (fresh versus frozen stored milk samples) on these methods and 3), to establish agreement between PCR and culture techniques using milk samples from go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14,15,23,24]. However, it is known that performances of molecular diagnostic methods highly depend on the DNA extraction methods used and their efficiency to remove the natural inhibitors, which are present in the milk samples [25,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14,15,23,24]. However, it is known that performances of molecular diagnostic methods highly depend on the DNA extraction methods used and their efficiency to remove the natural inhibitors, which are present in the milk samples [25,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, in clinical mastitis samples the culture and PCR methods showed a good concordance due to higher M. agalactiae concentration (Tatay-Dualde et al, 2015). Contrarily to mycoplasma culture, the detection of M. agalactiae in goat milk samples by PCR resulted unaffected both by AZ or BR addition (Amores et al, 2011) and freezing of milk samples (Tatay-Dualde et al, 2015). All in all, to improve the PCR sensitivity it is recommended to extract the DNA from a specific mycoplasma culture of the milk samples, instead of from the milk sample itself (Oravcová et al, 2009).…”
Section: Mycoplasma Sppmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Because of this, the culture in the first 24 hours after samples collection is recommended in BTM with low mycoplasma concentration. Notwithstanding, in clinical mastitis samples the culture and PCR methods showed a good concordance due to higher M. agalactiae concentration (Tatay-Dualde et al, 2015). Contrarily to mycoplasma culture, the detection of M. agalactiae in goat milk samples by PCR resulted unaffected both by AZ or BR addition (Amores et al, 2011) and freezing of milk samples (Tatay-Dualde et al, 2015).…”
Section: Mycoplasma Sppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milk (individual/pooled/tank), joint fluids, and eye swabs are relevant samples in diseased herds, and it is recommended practice to sample several animals in the same herd, due to inter-individual variability in shedding 1,107. Excretion in milk is higher in the clinical phase and might become intermittent with time,49,83,85,108 necessitating repeated samplings. Eye swabs and joint fluids tend to contain less mycoplasma (especially if lesions are not recent) and do not make the best samples in extensive surveys as they require animal containment or post-mortem sampling 43,51,84.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%