1988
DOI: 10.1364/ao.27.003299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of the backscatter/extinction ratio to changes in aerosol properties: implications for lidar

Abstract: The lidar ratio is found to be sensitive in three distinct regions in a space defined by index of refraction and particle size. This implies that inversion of the lidar equation will be complicated if the parameters of the aerosol under study fall into one of these sensitive regions. The model used to explore this space covers the complex plane of refractive index bounded by real part 1-2 and imaginary part 0-infinity and mode particle size parameter bounded by 0.03-3000. Furthermore, the model is compared to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the most frequent value pairs are within a range of the particle linear depolarization ratio of 5-7 % and a range of the lidar ratio of 50-60 sr. 50 % of all measurement points show values of the particle linear depolarization ratio between 5 % and 7 % and a lidar ratio between 51 and 61 sr, and about 90 % of all measurement points show values between 4 % and 8 % of the particle linear depolarization ratio and between 48 sr and 65 sr of the lidar ratio. The median of the particle linear depolarization ratio is 6 %, of the lidar ratio 56 sr. Lidar ratios around and below 40 sr, found for about 5 % of all measurement points, may either indicate rural particles (Evans, 1988;Anderson et al, 2000) or mixtures with other aerosol types (e.g. clean continental aerosol or marine aerosol).…”
Section: Fig 8 (A)mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, the most frequent value pairs are within a range of the particle linear depolarization ratio of 5-7 % and a range of the lidar ratio of 50-60 sr. 50 % of all measurement points show values of the particle linear depolarization ratio between 5 % and 7 % and a lidar ratio between 51 and 61 sr, and about 90 % of all measurement points show values between 4 % and 8 % of the particle linear depolarization ratio and between 48 sr and 65 sr of the lidar ratio. The median of the particle linear depolarization ratio is 6 %, of the lidar ratio 56 sr. Lidar ratios around and below 40 sr, found for about 5 % of all measurement points, may either indicate rural particles (Evans, 1988;Anderson et al, 2000) or mixtures with other aerosol types (e.g. clean continental aerosol or marine aerosol).…”
Section: Fig 8 (A)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The advantage of HSRL over normal backscatter-only lidar is the ability to directly measure the extinction-to-backscatter ratio (lidar ratio) of aerosols (Shipley et al, 1983;Shimizu et al, 1983). The value of this quantity depends on the physical properties of aerosols, namely the size distribution, the complex index of refraction and the morphology (Evans, 1988). It does not depend on its concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose the so-called Klett method [Klett, 1981;Fernald, 1984;Evans, 1988] is used. This method is less accurate because it requires the a priori assumption of the particle extinction-to-backscatter (lidar) ratio.…”
Section: Earlinet Raman Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AOD profile was inferrred using the assumption of a lidar ratio (extinction/backscattering) of 30 (Reagan et al, 1980;Ansmann et al, 1992). This typical value for rural aerosol (Evans, 1988) may be appropriate for the Egert site by reason of the relatively low AOD values recorded (see Fig. 8).…”
Section: Intercomparison Of Parameters With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%