Sensitivity of Subjective Decisions in the GLUE Methodology for Quantifying the Uncertainty in the Flood Inundation Map for Seymour Reach in Indiana, USA

Abstract

Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) is one of the widely-used methods for quantifying uncertainty in flood inundation mapping. However, the subjective nature of its application involving the definition of the likelihood measure and the criteria for defining acceptable versus unacceptable models can lead to different results in quantifying uncertainty bounds. The objective of this paper is to perform a sensitivity analysis of the effect of the choice of likelihood measures and cut-off thresholds used in selecting behavioral and non-behavioral models in the GLUE methodology. By using a dataset for a reach along the White River in Seymour, Indiana, multiple prior distributions, likelihood measures and cut-off thresholds are used to investigate the role of subjective decisions in applying the GLUE methodology for uncertainty quantification related to OPEN ACCESSWater 2014, 6 2105 topography, streamflow and Manning's n. Results from this study show that a normal pdf produces a narrower uncertainty bound compared to a uniform pdf for an uncertain variable. Similarly, a likelihood measure based on water surface elevations is found to be less affected compared to other likelihood measures that are based on flood inundation area and width. Although the findings from this study are limited due to the use of a single test case, this paper provides a framework that can be utilized to gain a better understanding of the uncertainty while applying the GLUE methodology in flood inundation mapping.

Beyond a fixed number: Investigating uncertainty in popular evaluation metrics of ensemble flood modeling using bootstrapping analysis

“…Additionally, it has been widely applied in the fields of hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Amponsah et al, 2022; Aronica et al, 2002; Beven & Binley, 2014; Blasone et al, 2008; Herrera et al, 2022; Jung & Merwade, 2012; Kobarfard et al, 2022; Mirzaei et al, 2015; Pappenberger et al, 2006; Ratto et al, 2001; Romanowicz & Beven, 2003). Thus, GLUE offers an informal Bayesian approach for generating the ensemble prediction of the variable of interest by accounting for various uncertainty sources in the flood modeling process (Beven, 2006; Beven & Binley, 2014; Jung et al, 2014; Vrugt et al, 2009). It should be also noted that the prediction distribution of water stage can be obtained based on any other appropriate multi‐model methods and Bayesian approaches besides GLUE.…”

Development of a New Generation of Flood Inundation Maps—A Case Study of the Coastal City of Tainan, Taiwan

“…Such maps have been widely researched and used [24][25][26][27][28]. Although FIMs may have a certain degree of uncertainty due to data collection and modeling technologies applied [29], such maps offer valuable means to enhance our understanding of local flood risks. FIMs can provide such information that is required by municipal authorities to more effectively inform citizens and adopt appropriate flood management strategies in advance.…”

Towards an Efficient Rainfall–Runoff Model through Partitioning Scheme

“…In recent years, many efforts have been made to identify, measure and reduce the uncertainty of parameters in CRR models. For example, in many studies multi-objective approach is deployed to reduce uncertainty in the parameter estimation [12][13][14], in some papers attempts have also been made to estimate the uncertainty parameter using methods such as the Generalize Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) and Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure (SUFI) [15][16][17][18][19]. Furthermore, in several other studies, hybridization methods by combining hydrologic predictions from multiple competing models are applied to overcome the model structural uncertainty [20][21][22].…”