Sensitivity of Simulated Aerosol Properties Over Eastern North America to WRF‐Chem Parameterizations

Abstract

Aerosol properties and their climatic feedbacks are characterized by high uncertainty in both global and regional model simulations. We explore sources of uncertainty in the representation of aerosol properties using an ensemble of simulations performed at 24‐km resolution with WRF‐Chem over eastern North America. The sensitivity of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and near‐surface fine particle concentrations (PM2.5) to planetary boundary layer (PBL) and aerosol schemes (modal with secondary organic aerosol versus sectional but excluding secondary organic aerosol), as well as different emission inventories (National Emission Inventory [NEI] 2005 versus 2011) is examined. We quantify the spread among ensemble members with respect to the model setup and compute statistical metrics to identify the run configuration that exhibits greatest fidelity relative to observations of aerosol and meteorological properties. Use of the Modal Aerosol Dynamics Model for Europe/Secondary Organic Aerosol Model scheme leads to highest agreement with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer clear‐sky AOD observations particularly when the 2005 NEI is used (with either PBL scheme). These members exhibit small negative mean fractional bias over the simulation domain (<2%) and relatively high spatial correlation in summertime mean monthly AOD (>0.5). The aerosol scheme and NEI dominate the ensemble spread in AOD. Near‐surface PM2.5 is also dependent on PBL scheme and is best reproduced in runs adopting a sectional approach and emissions for 2011. Thus, WRF‐Chem configuration associated with highest agreement with AOD observations is not the same as for PM2.5, possibly reflecting the importance of columnar water vapor in dictating AOD or other unexplored uncertainties linking surface mass concentrations to column optical properties.

Extreme Aerosol Events Over Eastern North America: 1. Characterizing and Simulating Historical Events

“…This negative bias in these simulations of extreme AOD events with the MOSAIC‐sectional aerosol scheme is consistent with the negative bias in mean AOD from a long‐term simulation by Crippa et al. (2019). For five of the six cases the bias is larger in the time‐averaged, spatially averaged median AOD than the mean AOD.…”

Extreme Aerosol Events Over Eastern North America: Part 2. Responses to Changing Emissions

“…Consistent with prior research, near‐surface PM 2.5 concentrations exhibit higher sensitivity to emission changes between 2005 and 2015 (Crippa et al., 2019). More grid cells exhibit significantly different PM 2.5 concentrations in simulations with all EF applied than are manifest in the AOD results (cf.…”

Understanding and improving model representation of aerosol optical properties for a Chinese haze event measured during KORUS-AQ

“…This overprediction could lead to mismatches between AOD and PM 2.5 in models using this code. Curci et al (2019) evaluated black carbon absorption for an ensemble of models over Europe and North America, finding that biases were driven by the mixing state assumptions in the optical properties computations.…”