SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015 2015
DOI: 10.1190/segam2015-5931741.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of seismic refraction inversion to smooth and blocky velocity gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial models for the inversion were derived by taking a Delta t-V for each receiver location and averaging the velocities at common depths, creating a pseudo-2D Delta t-V inversion (Jansen, 2010). WET inversion with the pseudo-2D Delta t-V initial model has proven to be an effective inversion schema at resolving large scale near-surface velocity features (Zelt et al, 2013) and for the estimation of smooth critical zone velocity structures (Nielson and Bradford, 2015). The inversions were carried out for 150 iterations, long enough for the RMS error to reduce to <3% of the maximum travel time of the modeled traces for all the inversion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial models for the inversion were derived by taking a Delta t-V for each receiver location and averaging the velocities at common depths, creating a pseudo-2D Delta t-V inversion (Jansen, 2010). WET inversion with the pseudo-2D Delta t-V initial model has proven to be an effective inversion schema at resolving large scale near-surface velocity features (Zelt et al, 2013) and for the estimation of smooth critical zone velocity structures (Nielson and Bradford, 2015). The inversions were carried out for 150 iterations, long enough for the RMS error to reduce to <3% of the maximum travel time of the modeled traces for all the inversion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial models for the inversion were derived by taking a Delta t-V for each receiver location and averaging the velocities at common depths, creating a pseudo-2D Delta t-V inversion [Jansen, 2010]. WET inversion with the pseudo-2D Delta t-V initial model has proven to be an effective inversion schema at resolving large scale near-surface velocity features [Zelt et al, 2013] and for the estimation of smooth critical zone velocity structures [Nielson and Bradford, 2015]. The inversions were carried out for 150 iterations,long enough for the RMS error to reduce to less than 3% of the maximum travel time of the modeled traces for all the inversion.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%