43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of Second-Mode Linear Stability to Constitutive Models within Hypersonic Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. 15 shows that the transport models of Stuckert and Blottner, predict approximately 10% and 25% difference in the magnitude of viscosity and thermal conductivity, respectively, at the peak boundary layer temperature of 2100 K. This difference results in an 8% variation in the peak growth rate prediction of the second mode instability. Similar results are reported for the M = 10 flat plate boundary layer in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ref. 15 shows that the transport models of Stuckert and Blottner, predict approximately 10% and 25% difference in the magnitude of viscosity and thermal conductivity, respectively, at the peak boundary layer temperature of 2100 K. This difference results in an 8% variation in the peak growth rate prediction of the second mode instability. Similar results are reported for the M = 10 flat plate boundary layer in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…al. 15 consider a spherically blunted right circular cone at a Mach number of 13.5. The sensitivity of the second mode growth rate to the variation of constitutive models for reaction rate, specific heat and transport properties are studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned investigations featured a wide variety of thermophysical models, because the mathematical description of high-temperature gas properties has remained a very active field of research over the past century; see the work of Chapman & Cowling (1939), Hirschfelder, Curtiss & Bird (1954, Blottner, Johnson & Ellis (1971), Gupta et al (1990), Fertig, Dohr & Frühauf (2001), McBride, Zehe & Gordon (2002, Magin & Degrez (2004), Scoggins (2017) or Clarey & Greendyke (2019). This motivated the investigations on the sensitivity of LST predictions to the thermophysical modelling by Lyttle & Reed (2005), Franko, MacCormack & Lele (2010) and, most thoroughly, by Miró Miró et al (2019a. The latter reported that second-mode instabilities were mostly affected by modelling inaccuracies that translated into a misestimation of the BL height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, boundary conditions imposed on the vehicle surface, such as, cold/adiabatic, smooth/rough, catalytic/non-catalytic can delay or augment the transition process. The variation in thermodynamic and transport properties of the gas can also have a major influence on flow stability [6]- [7]. In the context of drag reduction, the role of transport property variation, mainly that of viscosity stratification, has been studied widely for incompressible as well as non-Newtonian flows and is well documented in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stability studies of high-speed flows have reported that transport property effects can dominate over other thermodynamic and chemical reaction rate variations. Lyttle and Reed [7] consider a spherically blunted right circular cone at a Mach number of 13.5, and investigate the sensitivity of two different transport models (Stuckert and Blottner) on the second mode growth rate. They find that the peak growth rate of the second mode changes by around 8%, due to a 10% and 25% change in the viscosity and thermal conductivity values respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%