2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160500491740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of radar backscatter to desert surface roughness

Abstract: Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data have proved useful in remote sensing studies of deserts, enabling different surfaces to be discriminated by differences in roughness properties. Roughness is characterized in SAR backscatter models using the standard deviation of surface heights (s), correlation length (L) and autocorrelation function (r(j)). Previous research has suggested that these parameters are of limited use for characterizing surface roughness, and are often unreliable due to the collection of too few… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, traditional data collection methods cannot easily provide spatially‐ and temporally‐distributed data over large areas for assimilation into such models (Jetten et al , 1999; Le Bissonnais et al , 2005; Baghdadi et al , 2008), whereas remote sensing methods can (King et al , 2005). Most previous remote sensing studies have focussed on the use of microwave backscatter (Ridley et al , 1996; Baghdadi et al , 2002; Charlton & White, 2006), but because of the long wavelengths used, these data usually only characterize large roughness variations (i.e. > 1 cm), which are not useful in a fine‐scale context (Baghdadi et al , 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, traditional data collection methods cannot easily provide spatially‐ and temporally‐distributed data over large areas for assimilation into such models (Jetten et al , 1999; Le Bissonnais et al , 2005; Baghdadi et al , 2008), whereas remote sensing methods can (King et al , 2005). Most previous remote sensing studies have focussed on the use of microwave backscatter (Ridley et al , 1996; Baghdadi et al , 2002; Charlton & White, 2006), but because of the long wavelengths used, these data usually only characterize large roughness variations (i.e. > 1 cm), which are not useful in a fine‐scale context (Baghdadi et al , 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the LAI time series could not effectively detect phenology in this arid area, the backscatter series showed an apparent cycle of temporal variation. Backscatter from desert regions has been reported to depend on the development of vegetation, soil moisture content, and surface roughness (Ulaby, Baltlivala, and Dobson 1978;Ulaby, Moore, and Fung 1982;Kennett and Li 1989;Tansey and Millington 2001;Charlton and White 2006). The phenological pattern observed in the Taklamakan Desert was distributed along the Tarim River and its tributaries (Figure 9).…”
Section: Regional Phenology Detection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When flooded, the radar backscatter is subjected to wind-generated roughness, increasing its backscattered power σ 0 . When standing water left, low backscattered power can be partially explained by the presence of wind-blown sands that tend to fill between uneven spaces, thus causing the surface to smoothen [30].…”
Section: Episodic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%