2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography in Detection of Panlabral Tears of the Glenohumeral Joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The true extent of such extensive tears is frequently missed on noncontrast MRI and MR arthrography, thus, leading to problems with diagnosis, which further complicate treatment and outcomes. 4 Arthroscopic labral repair is the most common treatment for glenohumeral instability, providing excellent outcomes for anterior and posterior instability with high levels of patient satisfaction and high rates of return to sport. 5 However, when it comes to more extensive tears, arthroscopic treatment has less favorable outcomes; concerns regard recurrent instability and stiffness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The true extent of such extensive tears is frequently missed on noncontrast MRI and MR arthrography, thus, leading to problems with diagnosis, which further complicate treatment and outcomes. 4 Arthroscopic labral repair is the most common treatment for glenohumeral instability, providing excellent outcomes for anterior and posterior instability with high levels of patient satisfaction and high rates of return to sport. 5 However, when it comes to more extensive tears, arthroscopic treatment has less favorable outcomes; concerns regard recurrent instability and stiffness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The triple labral lesion of the shoulder is not easily detected by the available imaging methods; it can be diagnosed in up to 32.3% of cases when MRI arthrogram is used and in 8.7% when MRI is used 16 . This fact is probably due to the difficulty in diagnosing SLAP lesions, as demonstrated by Godinho et al 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Their description of 6 level IV articles regarding 360 and 270 labral tears is a constant reminder that, when it comes to treating large labral tears, expect heterogeneity but depend on core anatomic principles. [4][5][6][7][8][9] As first conceptualized by Warren et al, the circle model of shoulder stability postulates that, to create shoulder instability, the capsulolabral complex of the shoulder must be disrupted in 2 places. 10,11 Therefore, a panlabral lesion or 270 tear may represent a readily identifiable manifestation of this model.…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 307mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Because of the continually proven tendency of magnetic resonance imaging to underdiagnose labral tears, surgeons must be prepared to encounter a larger labral lesion than reported on magnetic resonance imaging. 9 Finally, surgeons must have a high index of suspicion for tear propagations in instability patients who report constant pain, even in between instability events. 12 Armed with these core insights, the orthopaedist can embrace the heterogeneity of large labral injuries and find comfort that successful treatment is dependent on restoring the anatomy.…”
Section: Brown Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%