2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of peatland litter decomposition to changes in temperature and rainfall

Abstract: Changes to climate are projected over the next 50 years for many peatland areas. As decomposition of peat-forming vegetation is likely to be intrinsically linked to these changes in climate, a clear understanding of climate-peat dynamics is required. There is concern that increased temperature and decreased precipitation could increase the rate of decomposition and put the carbon sink status of many peatlands at risk, yet few studies have examined the impact of both climatic factors together. To better underst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the effect size of warming was the most robust in peatland, which was related to the response of peatland to warming. Recent studies have indicated that warming in peatlands could cause changes in the species composition (Bell et al 2018;Ward et al 2015), soil enzymatic activities (Bragazza et al 2013), and microbial functional groups (Jassey et al 2013), thus affecting the litter decomposition rate. Our study also showed that the process of litter decomposition was significantly inhibited when the warming was greater than 5°C (Fig.…”
Section: Response Of Litter Decomposition To Warmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the effect size of warming was the most robust in peatland, which was related to the response of peatland to warming. Recent studies have indicated that warming in peatlands could cause changes in the species composition (Bell et al 2018;Ward et al 2015), soil enzymatic activities (Bragazza et al 2013), and microbial functional groups (Jassey et al 2013), thus affecting the litter decomposition rate. Our study also showed that the process of litter decomposition was significantly inhibited when the warming was greater than 5°C (Fig.…”
Section: Response Of Litter Decomposition To Warmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these variables are known to affect the ecohydrology of upland river basins (e.g. Simmons, 2003; Durance & Ormerod, 2007; Yallop, Clutterbuck, & Thacker, 2010; Armstrong, Holden, Luxton, & Quinton, 2012; Ritson et al, 2014; Armstrong, Waldron, Ostle, Richardson, & Whitaker, 2015; Parry et al, 2015; Bell et al, 2018). For example, Armstrong et al (2012) found that peatland vegetation type effects dissolved organic carbon (DOC) levels within soil and drain water samples.…”
Section: The Ember Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expenditure part of the carbon cycle, due to peat decomposition, is highly dependent on rapid changes in peat surface temperature and on the slower changes in temperature and moisture content of the deeper peat [72]. Mass loss of plant remains through decomposition gives a valuable measurement of net carbon loss, which can be useful for comparing ecosystem or litter substrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%