2012
DOI: 10.1002/met.1352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of orographic precipitation enhancement to horizontal resolution in the operational Met Office Weather forecasts

Abstract: Rain gauge observations show that when averaged over a large number of cases of frontal systems passing over the UK, strong orographic rain enhancement occurs on the lee slopes of the first hills encountered by the southwesterly flow in the warm sector. The operational forecasts using 1.5 km grid spacing produced realistic looking mean rainfall patterns over the Lake District and Wales, with an area-averaged rain accumulation error of less than 2%. Model-level rain rates increase with decreasing altitude consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While a deficiency in the mascon product cannot be ruled out, given the important role played by orography in driving the precipitation over the peninsula (van de Berg & Medley, 2016) and the sensitivity of orographic precipitation to horizontal resolution (e.g., Genthon et al, 2009;Smith et al, 2015), a plausible explanation is that the limited ability of the relatively coarse-resolution models to resolve the features and dynamics of the Antarctic Peninsula leads them to underestimate the true accumulation during EN15. The estimates fail to agree even within their error bars.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a deficiency in the mascon product cannot be ruled out, given the important role played by orography in driving the precipitation over the peninsula (van de Berg & Medley, 2016) and the sensitivity of orographic precipitation to horizontal resolution (e.g., Genthon et al, 2009;Smith et al, 2015), a plausible explanation is that the limited ability of the relatively coarse-resolution models to resolve the features and dynamics of the Antarctic Peninsula leads them to underestimate the true accumulation during EN15. The estimates fail to agree even within their error bars.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation occurrence and amount are among the hardest to predict, especially in mountainous terrain and summer [67] [68]. Here precipitation data are also the hardest to interpolate as gauges are often at low elevation and precipitation increases with height [69].…”
Section: Precipitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the orographically forced lifting was weaker in the model than real world. This well known model artifact leads to systematic errors in simulated precipitation [67].…”
Section: Precipitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, a number of studies analyse the effect of domain size and horizontal resolution (which is related to convection and cloud microphysics parametrization) on precipitation forecast skill in different numerical atmospheric models (e.g. Zängl, , ; Colin et al ., ; Güttler et al ., ; Smith et al ., ). Convection parametrization plays an important role at coarse resolutions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%