2016
DOI: 10.1007/5584_2016_138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of Next-Generation Sequencing Metagenomic Analysis for Detection of RNA and DNA Viruses in Cerebrospinal Fluid: The Confounding Effect of Background Contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further comparative efforts, including ones aimed at a determination of limits of detection (Bukowska-Ośko et al, 2017) are clearly needed to clarify the picture on the analytical sensitivity of HTS approaches.…”
Section: Considerations For An Hts Detection Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further comparative efforts, including ones aimed at a determination of limits of detection (Bukowska-Ośko et al, 2017) are clearly needed to clarify the picture on the analytical sensitivity of HTS approaches.…”
Section: Considerations For An Hts Detection Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of biological indexing, sometimes considered the gold standard in woody host plants, two large studies in grapevine (Al Rwahnih et al, 2015 ) and in temperate fruit trees (Rott et al, 2017 ) also suggest comparable sensitivities. Further comparative efforts, including ones aimed at a determination of limits of detection (Bukowska-Ośko et al, 2017 ) are clearly needed to clarify the picture on the analytical sensitivity of HTS approaches.…”
Section: Considerations For An Hts Detection Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During previous studies, we encountered the problem of contaminating DNA complicating the analysis of sequencing results (26), which is emerging as a common problem encountered when attempting to do metagenomic analysis of clinical samples (3,(27)(28)(29). Here, we evaluated three commercially available WGA kits to characterize the relative amount and composition of contaminating DNA associated with the use of each of them to inform selection of the appropriate WGA kit for further metagenomics studies of PJI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inconsistency could be due to general lower sensitivity of metagenomic workflows compared with real-time RT-PCR/PCR assays. Using serial dilutions of HIV- and HSV-positive sera in negative CSF, we previously established that the limit of detection for RNA- and DNA-based metagenomics was no better than 10 2 and 10 3 viral copies/reaction, respectively [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%