2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle–tendon properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
106
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
13
106
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous studies, model force-and momentgenerating capacities were most sensitive to uncertainty in tendon slack lengths (Delp et al, 1990;Out et al, 1996;Redl et al, 2007), although the magnitude of the effect varied across muscles (Figs 6, 7). The different sensitivities were due in large part to differences in the ratio of tendon length to muscle fiber length (Table 2), though model sensitivity may be influenced by other geometric factors, such as the ratio of tendon length or muscle fiber length to moment arm (Delp et al, 1990).…”
Section: Model Predictions and Sensitivitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Consistent with previous studies, model force-and momentgenerating capacities were most sensitive to uncertainty in tendon slack lengths (Delp et al, 1990;Out et al, 1996;Redl et al, 2007), although the magnitude of the effect varied across muscles (Figs 6, 7). The different sensitivities were due in large part to differences in the ratio of tendon length to muscle fiber length (Table 2), though model sensitivity may be influenced by other geometric factors, such as the ratio of tendon length or muscle fiber length to moment arm (Delp et al, 1990).…”
Section: Model Predictions and Sensitivitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…When developing a musculoskeletal model, it is important to test the sensitivity of its outputs to variations in the estimation of its parameters. The range for such sensitivity analysis is typically Յ10% of the relevant estimated parameter (24,30). Our results suggest that sensitivity analyses should cover a wide range (i.e., up to 30%) when a model's sensitivity to variations in Achilles tendon moment arm is evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…17 It is difficult to know how the model predictions of leg-muscle forces and tibiofemoral joint loading may be affected by these approximations. In a recent study on the sensitivity of muscle force estimates to changes in muscletendon properties, Redl et al 18 found that changes in the muscle-fiber length and tendon rest length of vasti were most critical to model estimates of leg-muscle forces in normal gait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%