2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2009.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of model-based quantitative FTIR to instrumental and spectroscopic database error sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several potential sources of error in the current studies, including technical errors, such as Beer's law non-linearity, instrumental misalignment, inaccurate weighing of the pure component samples, and scattering in the KBr pellets [41], which may have contributed to broadening of the peak positions in the Model B spectra. However, similar results for prediction of type II collagen in tissues were obtained with both Models A and B, indicating that the spectral artifacts did not interfere significantly with the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several potential sources of error in the current studies, including technical errors, such as Beer's law non-linearity, instrumental misalignment, inaccurate weighing of the pure component samples, and scattering in the KBr pellets [41], which may have contributed to broadening of the peak positions in the Model B spectra. However, similar results for prediction of type II collagen in tissues were obtained with both Models A and B, indicating that the spectral artifacts did not interfere significantly with the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the model was evaluated by assessment of the root mean square error (RMSE), and the regression coefficient (R 2 ) of the cross validation model. RMSE measures the precision of the model and is calculated according to the equation below:(i: number of samples = 1 to N) [40], [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RMSE measures the precision of the model and is calculated according to the equation below: RMSE=(Yprediction(i)Yexperiment(i))2N(i: number of samples = 1 to N). 2, 15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors due to a lack of knowledge about ILS during synthetic calibration have been considered in detail in the literature [32]. In the simplest approximation, ILS is a Fourier transform of apodisation functions [33], also called windows [34].…”
Section: Modeling Of Gas Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%