1994
DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90148-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of intrapartum group B streptococcal screening and in vitro comparison of four rapid antigen tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When ordinary cultures on blood agar were used, we found that 13.5% of the pregnant women in our study harbored GBS in the genital tract, which is within the range of prevalence (2 to 40%) reported by others (1,3,65). In almost two-thirds of the women in our study who had GBS cultured from the uterine cervix, GBS could also be found in the rectum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…When ordinary cultures on blood agar were used, we found that 13.5% of the pregnant women in our study harbored GBS in the genital tract, which is within the range of prevalence (2 to 40%) reported by others (1,3,65). In almost two-thirds of the women in our study who had GBS cultured from the uterine cervix, GBS could also be found in the rectum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, as compared to antibiotic therapy, chlorhexidine disinfection would ob viate the necessity of selection. The omission of rapid GBS antigen tests would be advantageous as, so far, they lack sufficient sensitivity [21].…”
Section: Ah Adriaanse Et a I /European Journal Of Obstetrics And Gymentioning
confidence: 99%