2001
DOI: 10.1139/w01-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaeto tannic acid is due to iron deprivation

Abstract: Tannic acid inhibited the growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Growth medium supplementation with more nitrogen or metal ions showed that only iron ions could restore the maximal growth rate of S. cerevisiae. Tannic acid resistant mutants were previously isolated by screening for tannic acid resistance and were all cytoplasmic petite mutants. While the wild type was very sensitive to iron deprivation conditions when grown in aerobic conditions, the mutants, whether grown aerobically or anaerobically, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that the encapsulated cells showed an unperturbed growth rate (m) (0.525 AE 0.032 h À1 for native yeast; 0.594 AE 0.059 h À1 for yeast@[TA-Fe III ] 2 ; 0.569 AE 0.072 h À1 for yeast@[TA-Fe III ] 4 ), even though TA was considered as a restrictive agent for the respiratory chain, possibly leading to slower growth rates and less fermentation products. [17] The result additionally confirmed that the combination of TA and Fe III (and the shell-forming conditions) did not alter the metabolic activities. On the other hand, the HCl treatment (20 mm ; 30 or 90 min) almost restored the division ability of both yeast@[TA-Fe III ] 2 and yeast@[TA-Fe III ] 4 (for 30 min HCl treatment, Figure S6).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…It is noted that the encapsulated cells showed an unperturbed growth rate (m) (0.525 AE 0.032 h À1 for native yeast; 0.594 AE 0.059 h À1 for yeast@[TA-Fe III ] 2 ; 0.569 AE 0.072 h À1 for yeast@[TA-Fe III ] 4 ), even though TA was considered as a restrictive agent for the respiratory chain, possibly leading to slower growth rates and less fermentation products. [17] The result additionally confirmed that the combination of TA and Fe III (and the shell-forming conditions) did not alter the metabolic activities. On the other hand, the HCl treatment (20 mm ; 30 or 90 min) almost restored the division ability of both yeast@[TA-Fe III ] 2 and yeast@[TA-Fe III ] 4 (for 30 min HCl treatment, Figure S6).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, RD mutants of both S. cerevisiae (52,53) and C. glabrata (54) display wall alterations that increased concanavalin A binding to the cell surface. In S. cerevisiae, RD mutants also displayed increased sensitivity to calcoflour white, suggesting a weakened cell wall in these strains (55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSE could be acting as a yeast inhibitory agent through a variety of mechanisms, either synergistically or not. One of the explanations for yeast inhibition due to tannins (proanthocyanidins) is iron deprivation (Wauters and others 2001). It was found in the Wauters and others (2001) study that growth medium supplementation with more nitrogen or metal ions showed that only iron ions could restore the maximal growth rate of S. cerevisiae .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the explanations for yeast inhibition due to tannins (proanthocyanidins) is iron deprivation (Wauters and others 2001). It was found in the Wauters and others (2001) study that growth medium supplementation with more nitrogen or metal ions showed that only iron ions could restore the maximal growth rate of S. cerevisiae . Tannnins are known transition metal chelators (Rice‐Evans and others 1997; Malesev and Kuntic 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%