2018 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/aupec.2018.8757980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of Hosting Capacity to Data Resolution and Uncertainty Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has to be tackled from a probabilistic perspective, considering relevant parameter uncertainties. This conclusion has been recently verified by numerous studies, as it was concluded that DHC studies, which ignore the uncertainty of electrical parameters, resulting in conservative HC levels that usually lead to a noticeable underestimation of the HC levels [28][29][30]. To perform a PHC analysis, the MCS is utilized to generate an appropriate number of probabilities for the studied uncertain parameters.…”
Section: Phc Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it has to be tackled from a probabilistic perspective, considering relevant parameter uncertainties. This conclusion has been recently verified by numerous studies, as it was concluded that DHC studies, which ignore the uncertainty of electrical parameters, resulting in conservative HC levels that usually lead to a noticeable underestimation of the HC levels [28][29][30]. To perform a PHC analysis, the MCS is utilized to generate an appropriate number of probabilities for the studied uncertain parameters.…”
Section: Phc Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, a dynamic framework that employs numerous uncertain parameters such as variable DG-produced power caused by climate fluctuations, the uncertainty of DG integration location and unit ratings, daily load profile variations, and uncertainties in network modeling in the case of the absence of confirmed real-time measurements is required to express HC better. In this regard, it was found that that deterministic HC (DHC) assessment methodologies only show a conservative (worst-case) figure for a network's capability to host more DG units [28]. For that reason, recent studies have started to use the probabilistic hosting capacity (PHC), unlike DHC studies, which ignore the uncertainty of the electrical parameters [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the constant generation method is very simplistic and can only be used to estimate the HC value. Furthermore, it is very easy to underestimate the HC when calculating it based on the worst-case scenario [14,41]. The reason for this is that minimum load consumption and maximum DER generation is unlikely to occur at the same time for most of the cases [42].…”
Section: Constant Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, long time scale historical data, such as one year or a few years [16], is needed to capture various combinations of production and demand. On the other hand, a relatively short time interval [34] (e.g., 1-min, 10-min, and 15-min) is critical for capturing the variabilities of these uncertainties. However, the adoption of time series analysis introduces a significant number of power flow calculations into assessments.…”
Section: Time-varying Renewables and Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%