2004
DOI: 10.2172/825184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SENSITIVITY OF HANFORD IMMOBILIZED HIGH LEVEL WASTE (IHLW) GLASS MASS TO CHROMIUM & ALUMINUM PARTITIONING ASSUMPTIONS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a chromium concentration limit of 1 mass% as Cr 2 O 3 was assumed for glasses in the eskolaite primary phase field, then roughly 8% of the glass volume would contain Cr 2 O 3 at this limit. It is worth noting that more recent estimates of Cr concentrations in the pretreated Hanford waste have been revised upward (see, for example, [21,22]). The average estimated composition of those glasses limited at 1 mass% Cr 2 O 3 from the Perez et al [16] study was taken as the baseline glass for this study.…”
Section: Vitrification Of High-cr Waste At Hanfordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a chromium concentration limit of 1 mass% as Cr 2 O 3 was assumed for glasses in the eskolaite primary phase field, then roughly 8% of the glass volume would contain Cr 2 O 3 at this limit. It is worth noting that more recent estimates of Cr concentrations in the pretreated Hanford waste have been revised upward (see, for example, [21,22]). The average estimated composition of those glasses limited at 1 mass% Cr 2 O 3 from the Perez et al [16] study was taken as the baseline glass for this study.…”
Section: Vitrification Of High-cr Waste At Hanfordmentioning
confidence: 99%