2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of growth of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch to climate change and forest management in boreal conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(47 reference statements)
5
72
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Populations located in the northern subtropical and mid-subtropical humid areas may experience greater precipitation and temperature under climate change [74]; this situation was predicted in our study as we concluded that Bio12 (annual precipitation) and Bio1 (annual mean air temperature) were the major bioclimatic variables contributing to the potential suitable habitat geographic distribution areas. Results consistent with previous studies indicate that trees located on the southern edge of their distributional range are expected to display growth declines, while increased growth is anticipated for those on the northern edge [19,64,[75][76][77].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Populations located in the northern subtropical and mid-subtropical humid areas may experience greater precipitation and temperature under climate change [74]; this situation was predicted in our study as we concluded that Bio12 (annual precipitation) and Bio1 (annual mean air temperature) were the major bioclimatic variables contributing to the potential suitable habitat geographic distribution areas. Results consistent with previous studies indicate that trees located on the southern edge of their distributional range are expected to display growth declines, while increased growth is anticipated for those on the northern edge [19,64,[75][76][77].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, intraspecific variation and local adaptation is not generally considered when assessing species responses to climate change [15,16]. By treating populations within a widespread species as an undifferentiated collection of individuals, differences in many physiological, ecological, and growth attributes are discounted and the assessment of climate change effects may result in a false net positive impact on forest productivity (herein considered only as area-base suitable habitat) [17][18][19]. However, among-population variation resulting from climate-related natural selection and local adaptation is widely observed along climatic gradients [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varjo 1977, Solantie 1998) The calculations were made using the ecosystem model developed by Kellomäki and Väisänen (1997) in which the selected weather and soil factors control the dynamics of forests. The model has been validated in several previous studies (Kellomäki and Väisänen 1997, Matala et al 2003, 2005, Briceno-Elizondo et al 2006. They show a high capacity of the model to simulate, in an acceptable way, the growth and development and the hydrological and thermal conditions in the forest soils typical for the Finnish forests (Venäläinen et al 2001a, Laurén et al 2005.…”
Section: Soil Frostmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…According to recent modeling work the three dominant tree species in Finland (Picea abies L., Pinus sylvestris L. and Betula pendula Roth) should respond positively to warmer growing season temperatures (Briceño-Elizondo et al 2006). Results from long term provenance trials on the other hand, indicate that a short transfer of approximately 2° latitude (~200 km) north increases volume, whereas southward transfers often lead to a decrease in performance (Johnsson 1976, Stener 1997, Viherä-Aarnio and Velling 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%