2005
DOI: 10.1049/ip-com:20045333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of FFT-equalised zero-padded OFDM systems to time and frequency synchronisation errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a small change in the plaintext (one bit) makes a large change in the ciphertext (half of its bits), then the Avalanche effect is evident and the algorithm has a powerful diffusion mechanism. This is guaranteed if we can assure that a bit change in the plaintext will affect at least one bit in each block of the input to the encryption algorithm, and the diffusion mechanism in the encryption algorithm will propagate this change through each block [44]. From Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of the Normalized Block Size On Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…If a small change in the plaintext (one bit) makes a large change in the ciphertext (half of its bits), then the Avalanche effect is evident and the algorithm has a powerful diffusion mechanism. This is guaranteed if we can assure that a bit change in the plaintext will affect at least one bit in each block of the input to the encryption algorithm, and the diffusion mechanism in the encryption algorithm will propagate this change through each block [44]. From Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of the Normalized Block Size On Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The zero-padded FFT offers increased frequency resolution by extending the length of the input data sequence in the time domain by padding with zeros at the tail of the discrete-time signal. Because of this, it has been widely used for wireless communications and radar systems that require high-frequency resolution [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus (14) 2) When the synchronization symbol is presents in only one of the two signal segments, using the distribution of the peak (absolute) ACF value given by (25) in Appendix B, The false alarm probability is (15) 3) When no synchronization symbol is present in either signal segment, the distribution of the peak (absolute) ACF value is given by (26) in Appendix B. The false alarm probability becomes (16) For the proposed parallel signal detector, we can then derive the probability of correct detection and identification of the TFC group when the synchronization symbols are present. Assume all 24 repeated synchronization symbols in a preamble of a data packet are available [1], this probability can be approximated as (17) for TF code 1-4 where there are 8 synchronization symbols on each frequency sub-band; and (18) for TF code 5-7 where all 24 synchronization symbols are in the same band.…”
Section: A the Evaluation Of Signal Detection And Tfc Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the SYNC design has been active for over a decade, either for general (single-band) OFDM transceiver structures [4], [6]- [8], [10]- [12], [14], [16], [20], [24], [27] or for specific communication systems using OFDM modulation, such as DVB-T [5], 802.11a WLAN [19] and MB-OFDM UWB [15], [17], [18], [21]- [23], [25], [26]. MB-OFDM UWB systems introduce frequency hopping, which brings up some unique issues for their SYNC design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%