2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2015.7325860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of C-band backscatter to surface roughness parameters measured at different scales

Abstract: SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) sensors measure the backscatter ( 0 ) of land covers and SAR images have a number of applications in agricultural soils (soil moisture, crop monitoring, etc.) but the surface roughness of these soils complicates their interpretation and determination of quantitative estimates of useful parameters. The aim of this study is to quantify the spatial variability of different roughness parameters and the sensitivity of  0 to them measured at different scales. Ten Envisat/ASAR images … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the two conventional geometry implementations, apart from the C-band as the moderate wavelength, the Gaussian ACF causes less deviation for higher wavelengths, and the exponential ACF results are better for lower wavelengths; this supports the deductions presented in [12,37,39]. The values of the standard deviation in Table 5 show a general improvement, but when considering the behavior of different geological surfaces with various levels of roughness on each of the SAR frequency image, we deduce that for lower frequencies (e.g., L-band), the rougher surfaces are in the fractal regime, confirming the conclusions presented in [21,40]; and for the higher frequencies (e.g., X-band), the smoother ones are in accordance with [6]. Therefore, the rougher surfaces in high frequencies and the smoother ones in low frequencies display an obvious diffractal behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the two conventional geometry implementations, apart from the C-band as the moderate wavelength, the Gaussian ACF causes less deviation for higher wavelengths, and the exponential ACF results are better for lower wavelengths; this supports the deductions presented in [12,37,39]. The values of the standard deviation in Table 5 show a general improvement, but when considering the behavior of different geological surfaces with various levels of roughness on each of the SAR frequency image, we deduce that for lower frequencies (e.g., L-band), the rougher surfaces are in the fractal regime, confirming the conclusions presented in [21,40]; and for the higher frequencies (e.g., X-band), the smoother ones are in accordance with [6]. Therefore, the rougher surfaces in high frequencies and the smoother ones in low frequencies display an obvious diffractal behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data acquired by the airborne and space-borne sensors has made it possible to examine the surface roughness, which provides useful information for geoscientists and geologists. The backscattered signal in all polarizations is affected by surface roughness, and contains the surface geometry information [4][5][6]. To measure the surface geometry using the SAR data, the surface geometric parameter(s) must be modeled against the backscattering coefficient on each polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is simple but it was found to be reasonably representative for many types of terrains [65,66]. The model has been applied for agriculture land surfaces by many researchers [57,[68][69][70][71][72].…”
Section: Incidence Angle Normalization Of Sar Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%