1980
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.5.789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of bronchoprovocation and tracheal mucous velocity in detecting airway responses to O3

Abstract: This study was undertaken to determine whether measurements of tracheal mucous velocity or airway reactivity to inhaled carbachol more sensitively detect airway effects of inhaled ozone (O3) in conscious sheep. Dose-response curves of mean pulmonary flow resistance (RL) to carbachol were obtained by measuring RL after five breaths of carbachol aerosol with stepwise increases in drug concentration. The animals then breathed 0.5 ppm O3 through an endotracheal tube for 2 h. The dose-response curves were repeated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many species, including guinea pigs, have previously been shown to display a large range of sensitivity to bronchoprovocation agents, and to the extent of resultant measured airway responsiveness (Turner & Martin, 1997). This variability may reflect interindividual differences in airway receptor number or sensitivity (Abraham et al, 1980;Ahmed et al, 1980). Susceptibility to O 3 -induced alterations in airway responsiveness has also been shown to be variable within any particular exposure group (Douglas et al, 1977;Snapper et al, 1978;Habib et al, 1979;Abraham et al, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many species, including guinea pigs, have previously been shown to display a large range of sensitivity to bronchoprovocation agents, and to the extent of resultant measured airway responsiveness (Turner & Martin, 1997). This variability may reflect interindividual differences in airway receptor number or sensitivity (Abraham et al, 1980;Ahmed et al, 1980). Susceptibility to O 3 -induced alterations in airway responsiveness has also been shown to be variable within any particular exposure group (Douglas et al, 1977;Snapper et al, 1978;Habib et al, 1979;Abraham et al, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPA, 1996;McDonnell et al, 1999;Thurston & Ito, 1999;Peden, 2000). A relationship between O 3 exposure and airway responsiveness is also supported by controlled studies; concentrations 0.3 ppm have produced transient AHR in normal laboratory animals (Abraham et al, 1980;Holtzman et al, 1983;Gordon et al, 1984;Gross & Sargent, 1992), and clinical studies noted AHR following exposure of normal humans to as low as 0.08 ppm (Seltzer et al, 1986;Horstmann et al, 1990;Ying et al, 1990;Linn et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ozone may also cause acute airflow limitation, as shown by increased airway resistance and reduced dynamic compliance. These acute obstructive effects quickly reverse after cessation of exposure [12,38,39]. Airflow limitation is also observed after chronic exposures, mainly caused by fibrotic lesions, and in these cases it persists after cessation of exposure [12].…”
Section: Effects Of Lung Function and Airway Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reversible increase in airway responsiveness to several contractile agents is observed in animals after acute exposure to a concentration of O 3 ranging 0.5-3 ppm [35,38,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Increased airway responsiveness to histamine has also been reported following exposure to 4 ppm or higher concentrations of NO 2 in guinea-pigs [53][54].…”
Section: Effects Of Lung Function and Airway Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozone exposure has long been recognized as producing airway hyperreactivity in humans and animals (Lee et al, 1977;Golden et al, 1978;Holtzman et al, 1979;Abraham et al, 1980). The role of inflammation in the etiology of the increased reactivity is controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%