2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-011-1205-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of an asymmetric 3D diffuser to vortex-generator induced inlet condition perturbations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schatzman & Thomas (2010) observed that DBD-VGs could be just as effective as co-flow actuators in a similar configuration. Grundmann, Sayles & Eaton (2011) and Grundmann et al (2012) found a significant improvement with DBD-VGs for controlling the separation bubble in a three-dimensional diffuser, where the effect was very similar to vane-type VGs with height h/δ ≈ 0.3-0.6. In addition, these actuators have recently been demonstrated to produce streamwise vortices in relatively high-speed turbulent flow (Wicks et al 2012).…”
Section: Dielectric-barrier-discharge Vortex Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Schatzman & Thomas (2010) observed that DBD-VGs could be just as effective as co-flow actuators in a similar configuration. Grundmann, Sayles & Eaton (2011) and Grundmann et al (2012) found a significant improvement with DBD-VGs for controlling the separation bubble in a three-dimensional diffuser, where the effect was very similar to vane-type VGs with height h/δ ≈ 0.3-0.6. In addition, these actuators have recently been demonstrated to produce streamwise vortices in relatively high-speed turbulent flow (Wicks et al 2012).…”
Section: Dielectric-barrier-discharge Vortex Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Most of these quantities can be extracted from MR data (Elkins and Alley, 2007). For example, three-dimensional, three-component (3D3C) MRV data was obtained from an internal flow through a ribbed cooling channel of a turbine blade , or flow through an open-celled foam structure (Onstad et al, 2011) or from flow through an asymmetric 3D diffuser (Grundmann et al, 2011).…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cherry et al (2010) later investigated the flow field and performance of an annular diffuser consisting of two different inlets, one had a fully developed flow while the other inlet was a wake induced by a row of struts. Cherry et al's experiment (2008) laid the groundwork for Grundmann et al's investigation which induced a different inlet secondary current using a plasma actuator and observed a significant difference in the mean flow-separation size and location which led to an improvement of the pressure recovery of 13-17% (Grundmann et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%