2015
DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-10309-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)

Abstract: Abstract. Aerosol radiative forcing estimates suffer from large uncertainties as a result of insufficient understanding of aerosol-cloud interactions. The main source of these uncertainties is dynamical processes such as turbulence and entrainment but also key aerosol parameters such as aerosol number concentration and size distribution, and to a much lesser extent, the composition. From June to August 2011 a Cloud and Aerosol Characterization Experiment (CLACE2011) was performed at the high-alpine research st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SS conditions of 0.5%–1.0% are suited for the observation of the CCN activation of low hygroscopic particles [ Kawana et al , ]. Although these SS conditions are high, they occur in the atmosphere because a peak SS in convective clouds can exceed 1.0% [ Hammer et al , ; Farmer et al , ]. These measurements were performed by maintaining the ratios of the setting diameters of DMA2 to those of DMA1 to 1.0 and 1.1, with varying setting diameters of DMA1.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SS conditions of 0.5%–1.0% are suited for the observation of the CCN activation of low hygroscopic particles [ Kawana et al , ]. Although these SS conditions are high, they occur in the atmosphere because a peak SS in convective clouds can exceed 1.0% [ Hammer et al , ; Farmer et al , ]. These measurements were performed by maintaining the ratios of the setting diameters of DMA2 to those of DMA1 to 1.0 and 1.1, with varying setting diameters of DMA1.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak supersaturation values, updraught velocity, aerosol hygroscopicity, and cloud droplet number concentration were studied by Hammer et al (2014), who found that all these quantities showed statistically significant differences between the two wind sectors. This work was extended by Hammer et al (2015), who quantified the influence of updraught velocity and particle composition and concentration on peak supersaturation.…”
Section: Measurement Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parametrization was also run for the overall median hygroscopicity value given by Jurányi et al (2011) of 0.2, as well as a value of 0.3, to test the sensitivity of the results to small changes in assumed hygroscopicity within the bounds of that which has been measured at the JFJ. Vertical velocity for the parametrization input was calculated using the method of Hammer et al (2014), multiplied by an estimated correction factor of 0.25, following the suggestions of Hammer et al (2015). Pressure and temperature at cloud base are also used, calculated in the same way as for the statistical model.…”
Section: Comparison With Physically Based Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the IPCC AR5 report, mountain regions are highly temperature sensitive, and increasingly vulnerable to high impact extreme events under a warming climate (Cramer et al, 2014). From an experimental scientific perspective, mountain sites are quite often the ideal locations for many types of cloud related research, in particular the connections leading from aerosols to clouds and their effects on radiation and climate (Friedman et al, 2013;Hammer et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%