2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and specificity of reflectance-mode confocal microscopy for in vivo diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
344
1
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
11
344
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…not done on new set of patients were excluded. Finally eight studies [21,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] met the criteria to be included for meta analysis. The evidence level of the studies was determined as per the NICE guidelines on development methods [33].…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…not done on new set of patients were excluded. Finally eight studies [21,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] met the criteria to be included for meta analysis. The evidence level of the studies was determined as per the NICE guidelines on development methods [33].…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Nori S et al sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using 1-5 criteria's of CLSM [21]. We used sensitivity and specificity values for 4 or more criteria's from this study as they give optimum sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations