2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2017.8264584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and robustness of quantum spin-1 rings to parameter uncertainty

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we somewhat heuristically follow the Liptak method of just averaging the | Z |'s and the p 's and verifying from the data of Table that the relation , with J T and p replaced by their means, holds up to several decimals. For the deployment of the Stouffer method, the reader is referred to the work of O'Neil et al…”
Section: Methods—type I Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, we somewhat heuristically follow the Liptak method of just averaging the | Z |'s and the p 's and verifying from the data of Table that the relation , with J T and p replaced by their means, holds up to several decimals. For the deployment of the Stouffer method, the reader is referred to the work of O'Neil et al…”
Section: Methods—type I Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of large as opposed to differential parameter variations is addressed by O'Neil et al and Jonckheere et al, where a structured singular value argument proves that the challenge to the classical limitation remains in force. Note that O'Neil et al not only considered coupling errors but also field focusing errors and that the same μ‐analysis argument() is able to cope with the initial state preparation errors.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown in previous work [16] that these controllers have interesting robustness properties in that the differential sensitivity of the transfer fidelity for superoptimal controllers, i.e., controllers that achieve unit-fidelity transfer, vanishes, which runs counter to the trade-off between performance and robustness that is commonly seen for classical systems [15]. However, other work indicates that this performance advantage disappears in the presence of decoherence [14], [17]. Moreover, differential sensitivity gives no information how the system responds to larger perturbations over a prolonged period of time, or what the critical frequencies are.…”
Section: Controlled Spin Networkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Comparing Eqs. ( 15) and (17), it follows that the steady states for the dephasing system can be related, via ρ ∞ , to the long-term time-averaged states for the fully coherent case.…”
Section: Long-term Time-averages and Asymptotic Steady Statesmentioning
confidence: 96%