2013
DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2012.749555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and Particle Swarm Optimization-based Congestion Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order show the effectiveness of the proposed strategy, the derived results have been compared with various methods discussed in the literature in Table . From the table, it is very clear that the CM cost obtained by the proposed method is only 1390.7 $/h, which is very less than those of Pandya and Joshi, Hazra and Sinha, and Saravanabalaji et al It is noted that the total real power reschedules for the congestion alleviation obtained by the proposed method are 46.1 MW, which is higher than that obtained in other techniques. This is due to the participation of loads in the congestion management.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order show the effectiveness of the proposed strategy, the derived results have been compared with various methods discussed in the literature in Table . From the table, it is very clear that the CM cost obtained by the proposed method is only 1390.7 $/h, which is very less than those of Pandya and Joshi, Hazra and Sinha, and Saravanabalaji et al It is noted that the total real power reschedules for the congestion alleviation obtained by the proposed method are 46.1 MW, which is higher than that obtained in other techniques. This is due to the participation of loads in the congestion management.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods fail to include the contribution of reactive power in congestion alleviation, ie, the reactive power sensitivities were not considered in selecting participating nodes. Pandya et al introduced real and reactive power sensitivity factors for selection of participating nodes. In this, the congestion management cost which includes both active and reactive power rescheduling cost was minimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an eye on estimating the number of generators needed in congestion administration, Pandya and Joshi (2013) have proficiently proposed dynamic and reactive power generator sensitivity features of the generators to the jam-packed lines. Thereafter, for the purpose of cutting back the variances of rescheduled values of dynamic power and reactive power of generators from scheduled values, a PSO based algorithm is initiated in respect of the voltage constancy upgrade and voltage profile growth benchmark.…”
Section: Recent Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the advancements in computation technology like parallel computation have stimulated many recent researchers to focus on the application of artificial intelligent (AI) techniques for CM problems in restructured power systems. Meta-heuristics algorithms like genetic algorithms (GA) [13,14], Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [15,16], etc., are applied to find the optimal settings of real power values which result in minimum congestion cost. The application of Differential Evolution (DE) for CM is discussed in [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%