2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2020.111998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and noise analysis of SAW magnetic field sensors with varied magnetostrictive layer thicknesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of the fundamental mode measured here is only outperformed by the sensors described by Schell et al [ 11 ] with 2000 / using a magnetic anisotropy controlled magnetostrictive layer or sensors with higher MS layer thicknesses [ 24 ]. Potentially, using these more enhanced layers, the overall sensitivity of the sensor geometry in this study could even surpass the one described there due to its enhanced magnetic sensitivity.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The sensitivity of the fundamental mode measured here is only outperformed by the sensors described by Schell et al [ 11 ] with 2000 / using a magnetic anisotropy controlled magnetostrictive layer or sensors with higher MS layer thicknesses [ 24 ]. Potentially, using these more enhanced layers, the overall sensitivity of the sensor geometry in this study could even surpass the one described there due to its enhanced magnetic sensitivity.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A thick SiO 2 guiding layer is deposited with a PECVD process covering the IDT electrodes. Finally, a 200 (Fe 90 Co 10 ) 78 Si 12 B 10 (FeCoSiB) magnetostrictive layer is deposited by magnetron sputtering from a single target with composition of (Fe 90 Co 10 ) 78 Si 12 B 10 and structured using a lift-off process [ 24 ] to yield the geometry shown in Figure 1 . To promote adhesion and prevent oxidation, 10 Ta layers on both sides of the FeCoSiB layer were deposited.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the sensitivity of Love wave magnetic field sensors is proportional to the thickness of the magnetostrictive phase, i.e., the thicker the magnetostrictive layer, the higher the sensitivity. The generated magnetic noise, however, shows the same dependency and therefore in a thickness range of 50 nm to 250 nm the resulting detectivity is virtually the same [433]. The detectivity in the ME sensors discussed so far is limited by different noise sources.…”
Section: Lf Me Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 91%