2014
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-143-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and evaluation of current fire risk and future projections due to climate change: the case study of Greece

Abstract: Abstract. Current trends in the Mediterranean climate, and more specifically in Greece, indicate longer and more intense summer droughts that even extend out of season. In connection to this, the frequency of forest fire occurrence and intensity is on the rise. In the present study, the Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) is used in order to investigate the relationship between fire risk and meteorological conditions in Greece. FWI is a meteorologically based index designed in Canada and used worldwide, includin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(34 reference statements)
3
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fogarty et al, 1998;de Groot et al, 2005de Groot et al, , 2007Palheiro et al, 2006;Taylor and Alexander, 2006) and for distinguishing periods of high fire activity (e.g. Bedia et al, 2014;Karali et al, 2014;Venäläinen et al, 2014). Furthermore, the FWI System has been found to outperform or at least match the performance of other FDRSs in terms of highlighting high fire activity periods in non-native environments (e.g.…”
Section: The Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fogarty et al, 1998;de Groot et al, 2005de Groot et al, , 2007Palheiro et al, 2006;Taylor and Alexander, 2006) and for distinguishing periods of high fire activity (e.g. Bedia et al, 2014;Karali et al, 2014;Venäläinen et al, 2014). Furthermore, the FWI System has been found to outperform or at least match the performance of other FDRSs in terms of highlighting high fire activity periods in non-native environments (e.g.…”
Section: The Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information from the ISI and BUI are combined to provide the numerical rating of fire intensity into FWI that is categorized into four fire danger classes (FWI < 8: low; FWI ≥ 8 and FWI < 17: medium; FWI ≥ 17 and FWI < 32: high; and FWI ≥ 32: extreme). The FWI has been widely tested and applied successfully across the Mediterranean Basin [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. To avoid overlapping results, only one point from the RACMO2 model's outputs was used as representatively for the subsequent FWI statistical analysis; i.e., Point 1 (SW Messinia) covering the area where the majority of people and values-at-risk are located ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Simulation Inputs and Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid overlapping results, only one point from the RACMO2 model's outputs was used as representatively for the subsequent FWI statistical analysis; i.e., Point 1 (SW Messinia) covering the area where the majority of people and values-at-risk are located ( Figure 2). Furthermore, after the calculation of the number of days with elevated fire risk (i.e., days with FWI ≥ 32) for all RCM grid points covering an extended area of southwestern Greece, maps were excerpted to portray the changes between the present and the future in the Messinia region, by implementing Kriging interpolation similarly to previous research [55]. For the quality assessment of the RCM data, a comparison of FWI values calculated using historical observations vs. FWI values calculated using model outputs (ensemble mean of the model for the nearest grid point) for the present period (1961-1990) was performed.…”
Section: Simulation Inputs and Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS) (Stocks et al 1989, Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group, 1992) enjoys very broad use not only in the vast forests of Canada but also in other parts of the world including Europe where the System's Fire Weather Index (FWI) was evaluated favourably, among others, by Viegas et al (1999) in comparison with four other methods of fire danger evaluation, and was adopted since 2007 at the EU level by the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (http://forest.jrc.ec.europa.eu/effis). The FWI was also evaluated favourably by Dimitrakopoulos et al (2011) and by Karali et al (2014) in Greece. Both these studies proposed FWI value classes for association with fire danger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%