2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-008-9115-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of the parameters of earthquake recurrence time power law scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 shows also the interevent distribution, that is, the probability of finding a specific B between any two single avalanches in type-(ii) experiment. It also follows a power-law distribution as observed in earthquakes, human communication, and other complex systems [28][29][30]. The fact that the intervent distribution obeys a power law suggests that very small B's should be chosen if we intended to avoid the gathering of small avalanches into larger events.…”
Section: Zero-temperature Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 shows also the interevent distribution, that is, the probability of finding a specific B between any two single avalanches in type-(ii) experiment. It also follows a power-law distribution as observed in earthquakes, human communication, and other complex systems [28][29][30]. The fact that the intervent distribution obeys a power law suggests that very small B's should be chosen if we intended to avoid the gathering of small avalanches into larger events.…”
Section: Zero-temperature Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(ii) In the second, we monitor the intensity of the individual avalanches occurring when the external field achieves a critical value, follow the evolution of the single avalanches, and then study also the distance between consecutive critical external field values. This latter study allows to inspect the interevent distribution and to compare it to similar distributions that have been predicted or measured for recurrence times in earthquakes [28], human communication [29], or theoretical models [30].…”
Section: Zero-temperature Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…9 the distributions have been used without these values. Talbi and Yamazaki (2009) suggested a formula for inter-event time cutoff, but the values the formula determines exceed the chosen value leading to poor statistics significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the attention paid to the statistics of the inter-event time (also called waiting time, interoccurrence time, etc.) between the consecutive earthquakes is continuously growing (Bak et al 2002, Corral 2004a, b, 2005Talbi and Yamazaki 2009, Lippiello et al 2012, Davidsen and Kwiatek 2013. Bak et al (2002) studied the distribution of the inter-event times ǻt between successive earthquakes for all earthquakes in different regions, by putting all events on the same footing (no distinction between mainshocks and aftershocks), therefore considering seismicity as a unique process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This catalogue is commonly used in literature to perform several statistical checks and validations of algorithms and procedures that deal with different aspects of seismicity; thus, this catalogue works like a sort of benchmark in seismology. According to Talbi and Yamazaki (2009), the magnitude of completeness during the observation period is 2.5; therefore the number of events with magnitude larger or equal to 2.5 is 30,306.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%