2021
DOI: 10.3934/math.2021431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of the complete electrode model for electrical impedance tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 It is considered preferable to reduce SCI to minimise the artefact and distortion of images. 15,19 Electrode size is an important parameter to ensure low SCI. Narrower electrodes have been shown to improve image resolution for changes that are occurring near the body surface close to the electrode, 20 but at depth, such as in the lung, this result cannot be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12 It is considered preferable to reduce SCI to minimise the artefact and distortion of images. 15,19 Electrode size is an important parameter to ensure low SCI. Narrower electrodes have been shown to improve image resolution for changes that are occurring near the body surface close to the electrode, 20 but at depth, such as in the lung, this result cannot be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCI has not been defined in animals and is likely much higher due to differing properties of the haired skin 12 . It is considered preferable to reduce SCI to minimise the artefact and distortion of images 15,19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The third case results in Figure 13 are characterized by overestimation of the air-related conductivity change near the chest. This occurs due to the presence of lung tissue very close to the chest boundary, as the EIT measurements are sensitive to conductivity changes near the boundary [ 62 ]. A visual comparison of the images in Figure 13 indicates that the PM-MoM SBL method has the best performance, an absence of “positive conductivity change” artefacts and less lung deformation.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence and uniqueness of the solution of the forward problem are proven in [95]. The discussion of the numerical solution and sensitivity analysis of the forward problem can be found in [96].…”
Section: Function Value Errormentioning
confidence: 99%