2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-002-0113-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of a no-crossflow model for the transient flowmeter test

Abstract: Logarithmic sensitivities and plausible relative errors are studied in a simple no-crossflow model of a transient flowmeter test (TFMT). This model is identical to the model of a constant-rate pumping test conducted on a fully penetrating well with wellbore storage, surrounded by a thick skin zone, and situated in a homogeneous confined aquifer. The sensitivities of wellbore drawdown and wellface flowrate to aquifer and skin parameters are independent of the pumping rate. However, the plausible relative errors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kabala (2001) proposed logarithmic sensitivity to analyze the pumping test on a well with wellbore storage and skin. In addition, Kabala et al (2002) also studied the logarithmic sensitivity, plausible relative errors, and deterministic parameter correlations in a simple semianalytic no-crossflow model of the transient flowmeter test (TFMT) that accounts for a thick skin around the wall. Vachaud and Chen (2002) analyzed a large-scale hydrologic model problem by sensitivity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kabala (2001) proposed logarithmic sensitivity to analyze the pumping test on a well with wellbore storage and skin. In addition, Kabala et al (2002) also studied the logarithmic sensitivity, plausible relative errors, and deterministic parameter correlations in a simple semianalytic no-crossflow model of the transient flowmeter test (TFMT) that accounts for a thick skin around the wall. Vachaud and Chen (2002) analyzed a large-scale hydrologic model problem by sensitivity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%