2017
DOI: 10.1090/qam/1475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis in poro-elastic and poro-visco-elastic models with respect to boundary data

Abstract: In this article we consider poro-elastic and poro-visco-elastic models inspired by problems in medicine and biology [12], and we perform sensitivity analysis on the solutions of these fluid-solid mixtures problems with respect to the imposed boundary data, which are the main drivers of the system. Moreover, we compare the results obtained in the elastic case vs. viscoelastic case, as it is known that structural viscosity of biological tissues decreases with age and disease. Sensitivity analysis is the first st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compute local sensitivities, we employed the complex-step method, described below. All our numerical results in [3] show that the solution is more sensitive to the boundary traction in the elastic case than in the visco-elastic scenario. This is in line with the well-posedness analysis provided in [12], where higher regularity in time was necessary for the boundary source in the poro-elastic case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to compute local sensitivities, we employed the complex-step method, described below. All our numerical results in [3] show that the solution is more sensitive to the boundary traction in the elastic case than in the visco-elastic scenario. This is in line with the well-posedness analysis provided in [12], where higher regularity in time was necessary for the boundary source in the poro-elastic case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The results of [12] prompted us to investigate numerically the sensitivity analysis of the (elastic displacement, pressure, discharge velocity)-solution with respect to the boundary source of traction (i.e., the Neumann boundary condition for the elastic displacement), and compare the results between the poro-elastic and the poro-visco-elastic cases. In [3], we worked in the framework of the numerical test cases considered in [12], considering both stationary examples, where the data and the permeability are constants, and dynamical ones, with permeability depending nonlinearly on the porosity. In order to compute local sensitivities, we employed the complex-step method, described below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathematical analyses on the behavior and properties of a fully hydrated poro-elastic or poro-viscous-elastic network focus on either the Biot system where the inertia of the poroelastic or poro-visco-elastic skeleton is important 7,8 , or a similar Darcy poroelastic fluid but without the friction between the fluid phase and the solid phase [9][10][11] . In this work we focus on regimes where the skeleton inertia is negligible and yet the skeleton undergoes elastic displacement, such as connective tissues or intracellular cytosols in many biological appli-cations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study showed that structural viscoelasticity plays a crucial role in determining the regularity requirements for volumetric and boundary forcing terms, as well as for the corresponding solutions. Moreover, in [3] it has been shown that the solution of the fluid-solid mixture (elastic displacement, fluid pressure, and Darcy velocity) is more sensitive to the boundary traction in the elastic case than in the visco-elastic scenario. These theoretical findings are also supported by experimental and clinical evidences showing that changes in tissue viscoelasticity are associated with various pathological conditions, including atherosclerosis [25], osteoporosis [2], renal disease [20] and glaucoma [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%